Like Freud's original theory, the neo-Freudian approach can be criticized for being subjective and difficult to test scientifically.
Neo-Freudians may have also overemphasized the importance of childhood experiences and unconscious motivations in shaping personality and behavior .In Freud's original theory, the concept of the Oedipus complex, which posits that boys develop sexual desires for their mothers and view their fathers as rivals, was heavily criticized for its cultural and gender bias.
Similarly, neo-Freudian theories such as Carl Jung's collective unconscious and Karen Horney's emphasis on the need for social connection have also been criticized for lacking empirical support and being difficult to test scientifically.
Moreover, critics of the neo-Freudian approach argue that it does not account for cultural and individual differences in personality development and focuses too heavily on the role of internal conflicts in shaping personality and behavior. Some critics have also suggested that neo-Freudian theories are overly deterministic and do not take into account the role of free will and individual agency in shaping personality and behavior.
Learn more about Neo-Freudians here: https://brainly.com/question/31444157
#SPJ11
how did Isaac shape Judaism in the 2000 years between Abraham
and Jesus?
Isaac was the son of Abraham and Sarah, and he played a significant role in shaping Judaism in the 2000 years between Abraham and Jesus.
The following are some of the ways in which Isaac impacted Judaism during this period:
Isaac is considered a central figure in the Abrahamic faiths, including Judaism. He is known for his obedience to God and his willingness to be sacrificed by his father, which is seen as a demonstration of faith in Judaism.
He is considered one of the patriarchs of the Jewish people, alongside Abraham and Jacob. Judaism traces its lineage back to the patriarchs, and they are revered as the founders of the faith.
Isaac's descendants, the Israelites, were the chosen people of God in Judaism. They were given the Ten Commandments and the Torah by God, which forms the basis of Jewish law and religious practice.
Isaac's legacy as a patriarch of the Jewish people has had a lasting impact on Judaism.
His story and teachings are still studied and celebrated by Jews around the world today.
Judaism- https://brainly.com/question/21757539
#SPJ11
1.The British empiricist philosophers in the 18th and 19th century held the universality assumption for cognition. The present cross-cultural paychology research shares the same assumption as theirs and makes arguments that are consistent with those philosophers.
True
or false
2.Cross-cultural studies have shown that, unlike Westerners, East Asians do not show the fundamental attribution error, regardless of the salience of situational reasons
True or False
3. Krys, Hansen, Xing, Szarota, and Yang (2014) have examined cultural differences in perceiving smiling individuals. They reported that smiling individuals were perceived as more intelligent in Germany and China while smiling individuals were perceived as less intelligent in Iran. To explain the differences, the authors used one of the cultural dimensions as the key framework. What is the cultural dimension they used?
a. Power distance
b. Masculinity-Femininity
c. Uncertainty avoidance
d. Individualism-Collectivism
1. The statement is True
2. The statement is True
3. The correct option is d. Individualism-Collectivism
1. The statement is False. The present cross-cultural psychology research does not share the same universality assumption for cognition as the British empiricist philosophers in the 18th and 19th century and neither makes arguments consistent with those philosophers. The British empiricist philosophers in the 18th and 19th century claimed that knowledge is based on sensory experience and that all individuals are born with a blank slate, which is filled with content from the environment. This assumption was often labeled as "tabula rasa". Present cross-cultural psychology research, on the other hand, supports the view that cognition is not entirely universal, but is influenced by cultural experience.
2. The statement is True. East Asians do not show the fundamental attribution error in cross-cultural studies, regardless of the salience of situational reasons, unlike Westerners. The fundamental attribution error refers to the tendency to overemphasize dispositional (internal) explanations for others' behavior and underemphasize situational (external) explanations. Westerners are more likely to commit this error, while East Asians are more likely to take situational factors into account.
3. Krys, Hansen, Xing, Szarota, and Yang (2014) used the cultural dimension of Individualism-Collectivism as the key framework to explain the differences in perceiving smiling individuals in their study on cultural differences. Therefore, the correct option is (d) Individualism-Collectivism.
To learn more about British empiricist philosophers visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14409563
#SPJ11
what changes in governance occurred from the reign of louis xvi through the napoleonic age?
The changes in governance from the reign of Louis XVI through the Napoleonic Age included the French Revolution, the establishment of the First French Republic, the rise of Napoleon Bonaparte, and the subsequent establishment of the Napoleonic Empire.
The reign of Louis XVI marked the final years of the French monarchy, which was characterized by an absolute monarchy and a rigid social hierarchy. However, the French Revolution brought significant changes to governance. The revolution led to the overthrow of the monarchy, the establishment of the First French Republic in 1792, and the execution of Louis XVI in 1793.
During the revolutionary period, various forms of government were experimented with, including the Reign of Terror under the Committee of Public Safety. However, it was Napoleon Bonaparte who emerged as a dominant figure during this time. In 1799, Napoleon staged a coup d'état and assumed power as First Consul.
Learn more about Napoleonic Age here:
https://brainly.com/question/31301009
#SPJ11
In the picture, the angle made by the goniometer is classified as a(n) ___ angle. ___ ° < θ < ___ .
In the picture, the angle made by the goniometer is classified An obtuse angle which is greater than 90 degrees and less than 180 degrees.
How to explain the informationAn obtuse angle is an angle that measures more than 90 degrees but less than 180 degrees. In other words, it is an angle that is greater than a right angle (90 degrees) but smaller than a straight angle (180 degrees). The term "obtuse" refers to the fact that the angle is "blunt" or "less sharp" compared to a right angle.
Visually, an obtuse angle can be identified by its openness. It forms an "open" or "widely spread" angle between two rays that extend from a common vertex, where the rays are not in a straight line but instead spread apart.
Learn more about angle on
https://brainly.com/question/25716982
#SPJ1
Spanish missionaries considered European ideas about civilization to be___
A) incompatible with the teachings of Christianity.
B) necessary for the full conversion of Indians to Christianity.
C) different and separate from the task of converting Indians.
D) no better than the Indians' ideas about civilization.
Spanish missionaries considered European ideas about civilization to be option D) no better than the Indians' ideas about civilization.
European conceptions of population were viewed as superior and more advanced by Spanish missionaries. When compared to the indigenous cultures that they encountered in the Americas, they thought that European civilization was more developed, culturally refined, and technologically advanced.
The missionaries from Spain believed that the native people, whom they regarded as "barbaric" or "uncivilized," needed Christianity and European practices introduced to them. They aimed to "civilize" the indigenous peoples and convert them to European ways of life because they saw themselves as agents of progress and enlightenment.
To learn more about Population, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/31598322
#SPJ4
during world war i the selective service examination demonstrated that
The selective service examination during World War I demonstrated the need for physically and mentally fit individuals in the American armed forces. It ensured that only qualified men, meeting health and skill criteria, were called to serve.
During World War I, the selective service examination demonstrated that the American armed forces needed men who were not only physically fit but also mentally and emotionally stable. The examination, which was conducted by the US government, aimed to test the mental and physical fitness of young men in the US.
The purpose of this examination was to ensure that only the most qualified individuals were called to military service during World War I. In order to be deemed eligible for service, men had to meet certain physical and mental requirements. They had to be free of any major health issues that would prevent them from performing their duties and had to demonstrate the ability to follow orders and work as part of a team. They also had to be mentally stable and not suffer from any serious psychological disorders that could affect their performance in battle. Additionally, they had to pass a series of written and oral tests that would evaluate their basic literacy and numeracy skills as well as their knowledge of military tactics and procedures. Overall, the selective service examination was a critical tool that helped the US government identify and recruit the most qualified men to fight in World War I.
To learn more about World War I visit:
https://brainly.com/question/8535233
#SPJ11
According to the map, which of these places were part of the French Empire or allied with France at some point?
Check all that apply.
Italy
Great Britain
Russian Empire
Austrian Empire
Prussia
Italy and Prussia were part of the French Empire or allied with France at some point, while Great Britain, the Russian Empire, and the Austrian Empire were not.
The allies of the French EmpireItaly: Italy was partially under French control during the Napoleonic era. Napoleon Bonaparte and the French army established the Kingdom of Italy in 1805, with Napoleon being crowned as King of Italy. Several regions of modern-day Italy were incorporated into the French Empire or under French influence during this time.
Great Britain: Great Britain was not part of the French Empire or allied with France during the period mentioned. In fact, the two powers were often adversaries, particularly during the Napoleonic Wars.
Russian Empire: The Russian Empire was not part of the French Empire or allied with France during the period mentioned.
Read mroe on French Empire https://brainly.com/question/31030614
#SPJ1
1. What combination of factors resulted in the military defeat
of Nazi Germany? In your opinion, what could Germany have done to
win the war? Explain.
The military defeat of Nazi Germany was primarily the result of a combination of factors, including the overwhelming strength and coordination of the Allied forces, Germany's failed invasion of the Soviet Union and subsequent setbacks on the Eastern Front, economic and industrial strain, strategic mistakes, and technological inferiority. These factors collectively contributed to Germany's ultimate defeat in World War II. The military defeat of Nazi Germany was the result of a combination of various factors.
These factors included Stalingrad's defeat: The German army lost the battle of Stalingrad, which resulted in the loss of around 300,000 troops and equipment. This proved a significant setback for Germany, making it almost impossible for the Axis power to win the war. Over-extension of resources: The invasion of the Soviet Union in 1941 stretched German resources beyond their capacity. The Germans were already fighting wars in North Africa, Italy, and the Atlantic, and the Eastern Front consumed much of their resources. The bombing of German cities: The Allies used air raids to bomb German cities, which destroyed German infrastructure, factories, and rail lines. The bombing campaign weakened Germany's industrial capacity and forced the country to redirect resources to rebuild its cities. This was a significant setback for the Axis powers. Economic Blockade: The Allies had a thriving economic blockade on Germany, restricting its access to resources and fuel. This blockade put immense pressure on the German economy, making it almost impossible for the Axis powers to win the war. Germany could have won the battle without invading the Soviet Union in 1941. Instead, they could have focused on consolidating their power in Western Europe. Germany was already victorious in occupying France, Belgium, and the Netherlands, and they could have used their resources to defend and maintain their territories. If Germany had not invaded the Soviet Union, they would have avoided the war on two fronts and could have directed all their resources to the Western front.
Learn more about Nazi here: https://brainly.com/question/15612254.
#SPJ11
How was life during WWI? How did the war impact people's lives and attitudes?
During World War I, life was extremely difficult for people, especially those living in countries that were directly involved in the war. The war had a massive impact on people's lives and attitudes, and here's how:
1. Military service: Men between the ages of 18 and 45 were required to serve in the military. This meant that many families were separated, and women and children were left to run households.
2. Food shortages: With many farmers drafted into the military, food shortages became common. People were forced to ration their food, and this caused malnutrition.
3. Inflation: With so many people fighting the war, the workforce was severely depleted. This caused a shortage of goods and services, leading to inflation.
4. Psychological effects: The horrors of the war caused a significant impact on people's mental health. The high number of casualties, gruesome injuries, and gas attacks left soldiers with severe psychological trauma.
5. Political changes: World War I brought significant political changes to many countries. In Russia, the monarchy was overthrown, and a communist government was established. In Germany, the Kaiser was forced to abdicate, leading to the establishment of the Weimar Republic.
Overall, the war impacted people's attitudes towards war and the government. Many people became disillusioned with their leaders and were more likely to question authority. The war also led to the rise of new political ideologies such as communism and fascism.
Life during World War I was marked by unprecedented challenges, hardships, and disruptions for people across the globe. The war, which lasted from 1914 to 1918, had a profound impact on all aspects of society and significantly shaped people's lives and attitudes.
1. Loss and Destruction: The war caused immense loss of life and destruction. Millions of soldiers and civilians lost their lives, leaving families devastated and communities mourning. The scale of casualties, especially in trench warfare, was unlike anything experienced in previous conflicts.
2. Rationing and Shortages: The war led to widespread rationing of essential goods and commodities. Food, fuel, clothing, and other necessities were scarce, and governments imposed strict rationing systems to ensure resources were diverted to the war effort.
3. Economic Hardships: The war disrupted economies and led to inflation and rising costs of living. Many people faced economic hardships, as industries focused on producing war materials rather than consumer goods.
4. Propaganda and Patriotism: Governments on all sides used propaganda to rally public support for the war. Patriotic fervor was encouraged, and citizens were encouraged to support the war effort through various means, including purchasing war bonds and participating in volunteer organizations.
5. Women's Role: World War I saw a significant shift in women's roles as many men went to fight, leaving vacancies in the workforce. Women took on jobs traditionally held by men in factories, farms, and other industries, contributing to the war effort and laying the foundation for future advancements in women's rights.
6. Psychological Impact: The war's brutality and long-lasting nature had a profound psychological impact on soldiers and civilians alike. Many soldiers experienced trauma from the horrors of the battlefield, leading to conditions like shell shock (now known as PTSD). The war's toll on mental health extended beyond the front lines, affecting families and communities back home.
7. Changing Attitudes: World War I shattered the romanticized notions of war, leading to disillusionment and skepticism about the glory of military conflict. Many people questioned the motives and conduct of the war, and war poets and writers depicted the true horrors of battle, giving rise to anti-war sentiments.
8. Political Shifts: The war led to significant political changes and the collapse of several empires, such as the Austro-Hungarian and Ottoman empires. New nation-states emerged, and geopolitical realignments reshaped the global landscape.
9. Aftermath and Treaty of Versailles: The war's aftermath saw the signing of the Treaty of Versailles, which imposed heavy reparations and territorial losses on Germany. The treaty's terms created long-lasting resentment and political instability, contributing to the conditions that led to World War II.
Overall, World War I had a profound and lasting impact on people's lives and attitudes. It left a legacy of trauma, social changes, and geopolitical shifts that shaped the course of the 20th century and beyond. The war's effects were far-reaching and continue to influence global affairs and societies to this day.
To know more about war:
https://brainly.com/question/32868318
#SPJ2
how is the taj mahal different from maya lin's vietnam war memorial?
The Taj Mahal and Maya Lin's Vietnam War Memorial differ in terms of their purpose, architectural style, and symbolism.
The Taj Mahal, located in Agra, India, is a mausoleum built by Emperor Shah Jahan in memory of his wife. It is renowned for its grandeur, intricate design, and use of white marble. The Taj Mahal represents a symbol of love and devotion.
On the other hand, Maya Lin's Vietnam War Memorial, located in Washington, D.C., is a minimalist memorial that commemorates the soldiers who lost their lives in the Vietnam War. It consists of two black granite walls sunk into the ground, engraved with the names of the deceased. The memorial evokes a sense of reflection and remembrance.
Architecturally, the Taj Mahal reflects the Mughal architectural style with its domes, minarets, and ornate detailing. It embodies symmetry and opulence. In contrast, Maya Lin's memorial embraces a modernist aesthetic, utilizing simple and unadorned materials to convey a powerful message.
Symbolically, the Taj Mahal represents eternal love, while the Vietnam War Memorial focuses on honoring the fallen soldiers and providing a space for contemplation.
Learn more about Vietnam War here:
https://brainly.com/question/31746600
#SPJ11
A criticism of the symbolic interaction is that it-
1. Paints a too rosy picture of society
2. focuses all its attention on major social institutions
3. focuses only on conflict and not common values and beliefs
4. overlooks the wide spread influence of culture and structural f
The criticism of symbolic interaction is that it 4. overlooks the widespread influence of culture and structural factors.
What is Symbolic interaction?
Symbolic interaction is an approach to understanding social life that centers around the analysis of significant, symbolic communication events. It is a theoretical approach that focuses on the relationship between individuals, society, and culture.
Social interaction theory is built on the assumption that human behavior is shaped by symbolic communication and self-concepts. This approach emphasizes the importance of the individual's self-concept in shaping the way they see themselves and how they interact with the world around them.
Criticism of Symbolic Interaction:
The criticism of symbolic interaction is that it overlooks the widespread influence of culture and structural factors. This approach may be effective in analyzing small-scale interactions and relationships between individuals.
However, it can be insufficient when dealing with larger social problems that require an analysis of structural factors such as poverty, racism, and inequality.
Symbolic interaction theory is also criticized for its focus on the micro level, which means it ignores the broader social, economic, and political systems that shape people's lives.
The theory is also criticized for overemphasizing individual agency and ignoring the role that social structure and culture play in shaping individuals' lives.
To learn more about Symbolic interaction visit:
https://brainly.com/question/2125966
#SPJ11
the political history of the hellenistic period was dominated by
The political history of the Hellenistic period was dominated by three powerful kingdoms after the death of Alexander the Great.
The term "Hellenistic" is derived from the Greek word "Hellenes," which refers to the Greek-speaking people who inhabited the eastern Mediterranean region. The political history of the Hellenistic period was dominated by the following three powerful kingdoms:
Seleucid Empire:The Seleucid Empire was founded by Seleucus I Nicator, a former general of Alexander the Great. The Seleucid Empire was one of the largest empires of the Hellenistic period, encompassing much of the Near East and Central Asia.
Ptolemaic Kingdom:The Ptolemaic Kingdom was established by Ptolemy I Soter, another former general of Alexander the Great. The kingdom was located in Egypt and was renowned for its intellectual and cultural achievements.
Antigonid Kingdom:The Antigonid Kingdom was established by Antigonus I Monophthalmus, yet another former general of Alexander the Great. The kingdom was located in Greece and Macedonia and was known for its strong military forces and aggressive foreign policy.
Hellenistic period- https://brainly.com/question/27244122
#SPJ11
Who has gone on The Road Trip to the Disarmament Conference
(1920's)? What is happening in the world regarding militarism? Who
was obeying the peace treaties? Who wasn't?
In the 1920s, the Road Trip to the Disarmament Conference in Geneva involved the United States, France, Japan, and Italy, as they discussed disarmament under the League of Nations. While some countries adhered to peace treaties, such as the Allied Powers and many Central Powers, Japan and Italy disregarded the treaties and pursued militaristic actions.
The Road Trip to the Disarmament Conference was an international conference held in Geneva, Switzerland in the 1920s to discuss disarmament. The United States, France, Japan, and Italy attended the conference, which was called by the League of Nations.
The current state of militarism in the world is a complex issue. Some countries have reduced their military spending and are moving towards peaceful resolutions of conflicts, while others continue to build up their military forces and engage in aggressive actions against other countries. Additionally, there are concerns about the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and the use of military force to address issues like terrorism.
Parties that were obeying the peace treaties included the Allied Powers (primarily the United States, Great Britain, and France) and many of the Central Powers. Germany, in particular, was subject to strict disarmament requirements under the Treaty of Versailles. However, not all countries were willing to follow the peace treaties. Japan and Italy, for example, continued to expand their military forces and engage in aggressive actions against other countries despite the restrictions outlined in the treaties.
To learn more about Disarmament Conference visit:
https://brainly.com/question/33440255
#SPJ11
Statistical power is affected 'most' by
and internal validity means not impacted the IV causing the DV.
Sample size, confounding factors
Sample size, bias
Study duration, blas
Study duration, confounding factors
Statistical power is affected 'most' by sample size and internal validity means not confounding factors impacted the IV causing the DV.
The option (A) is correct.
Regarding the second statement, internal validity refers to the extent to which a study accurately measures the causal relationship between the IV and DV, without the influence of confounding variables. Internal validity is threatened when the IV is impacted by factors other than what the researcher intended.
In summary, statistical power is primarily influenced by sample size and the presence of confounding factors. Additionally, internal validity is compromised when the IV is impacted by factors other than the intended manipulation.
Learn more about Statistical power:
https://brainly.com/question/32492164
#SPJ4
This question is not complete, Here I am attaching the complete question:
Statistical power is affected 'most' by________ and internal validity means not _________impacted the IV causing the DV.
(A) Sample size, confounding factors
(B) Sample size, bias
(C) Study duration, blas
(D) Study duration, confounding factors
PLS HELP how is the Holocaust an example of genocide
Answer:
See explanation.
Explanation:
I've given a rather bare bones answer here, but it can definitely be expanded upon given a bit of research if you need to write an essay on this topic.
Genocide can be defined as deliberately killing a large group of people from a specific ethnicity, race, religion, etc with the intention of wiping out that group. The Holocaust was an effort to wipe out the Jewish people during World War 2. There were an estimated 6 million Jewish people killed, alongside millions of others. Since the intention of the people behind the Holocaust was to completely wipe out the Jewish people, it is an example of genocide due to not only the intention of removing the Jewish people but also because of the millions of casualties.
in the nineteenth century it was common for representatives to serve more than 10 years
The statement "in the nineteenth century, it was common for representatives to serve more than 10 years" is true because there was no limit on the number of terms a representative could serve during this period.
Members of the U.S. House of Representatives served on an unlimited number of two-year terms until 1995, when the term limits were changed to a maximum of three two-year terms. There was a lot of congressional turnover in the 19th century, despite the absence of term limits.
While many lawmakers served more than 10 years in the House of Representatives, the average tenure was only a few terms because many lawmakers chose to step down after serving for a few years. A number of factors contributed to the frequent turnover, including long travel times to and from Washington, lack of modern communication, and the high cost of running for office.
in the nineteenth century it was common for representatives to serve more than 10 years. true or false
Learn more about nineteenth century https://brainly.com/question/32681250
#SPJ11
The second half of the twentieth century was largely defined by the Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union, as well as their respective allies. The US and Soviet Union engaged in a global struggle for influence in the independent countries emerging from the ashes of the French and British empires, and this global rivalry would have a major impact on modern culture and politics.
Question: Following World War II and during the Cold War, the French and British empires began to crumble, and former colonies became independent nation-states. Using the example of Vietnam, please discuss how non-European political leaders adopted modern political principles about democracy and national self-determination, which were largely formed in Europe and North America.
In Vietnam, the anti-colonial struggle had been ongoing since the 1940s, and after the French were defeated in 1954, the central government in Hanoi declared independence.
The new government was strongly influenced by the national self-determination and democratic principles that had been emerging in Europe and North America throughout the 20th century. Inspired by the writings of figures Trotsky, the new government pursued a fiercely independent foreign policy and embraced universalistic ideals of social justice.
They even sent students abroad to study with the goal of inspiring national development and taking economic power away from France. The national success of Vietnam serves as an example of how non-European countries took up, modified, and improved upon principles of modern politics.
To know more about Vietnam , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/26169710
#SPJ4
Step 2: Write one paragraph discussing the motivations for and impact of imperialism on European nations.
There are no positive effects.
Imperialist Europe used the 3 Cs (commerce, Christianity and Civilization) as a cover to bring death, destruction, disease and dispossesion to the “Natives”.
The so-called positive effets are part and parcel of the Civilizing Mission. The Civilizing Mission of imperialist Europe is the biggest hoax in world history.
European colonialists destroyed cities, kingdoms, empires and sultanates during colonial wars. They looted royal palaces and sacred shrines. They brought to Europe the loot of their aggression. Thousands of our works of art and artifacts now sit in colonial museums.
Millions of people were killed, worked to death or enslaved on their own ancestral lands in order enrich European colonial powers.
Imperialist Europe created a Tarzan image of Africa full of jungle static primitives and exported this image as a global brand through Tarzan movies and Tintin comic books.
The Jungle is a such a small part of Africa’s geography concentrated in the Congo Rainforest. Most of our ancestors were farmers not hunters.
Imperialist Europe made sure that the Golden Age of the African Moors, the splendor of ancient Egypt, the greatness of Axum, the caravans of gold of the Golden Kingdoms of West Africa, the advanced city states along the East African coast, the African Kingdoms who had trade and diplomatic missions in Europe and the Americas (Kongo and Dahomey), Monomotapa who had trade links with China, early Christianity in North-East Africa were erased from the narratives on African history.
We were all savages and pagans until Europeans came to civilize and Christianize us.
The history of policing in the United States most often focuses exclusively on the history of policing in the northern territories, which overlooks what areas of historical importance?
a. Policing in the Midwest
b. Slave patrols
c. Policing on the western frontier
d. Both answers b & c
The history of policing in the United States most often focuses exclusively on the history of policing in the northern territories, which overlooks Option d. Both answers b & c that is Slave patrols and Policing on the western frontier.
The Metropolitan Police Service, the first modern and professional police force in the world, was established on September 29, 1829, by the British government in London. This police department was set up by the government to control crime and keep people safe from criminals. In order to keep criminal activity under control, every nation after Britain established a police force.
Police corruption developed as a result of prohibition, which damaged public confidence in the local police. Further, it prompted correctional facilities and courts being excessively full with individuals who were gotten with liquor.
To learn about united states
https://brainly.com/question/17253078
#SPJ4
in the virginia and kentucky resolutions it was asserted that
In the Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions, it was asserted that states have the right to nullify or reject federal laws they deem unconstitutional.
The Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions were political statements drafted in 1798 and 1799, respectively, in response to the passage of the Alien and Sedition Acts by the federal government. These resolutions were written by James Madison (Virginia Resolution) and Thomas Jefferson (Kentucky Resolution) and presented arguments in favor of states' rights and the principle of nullification. According to these resolutions, if a state believed that a federal law exceeded the powers granted to the federal government by the Constitution or violated the rights of the states, it had the authority to declare the law null and void within its borders.
The Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions expressed the belief that states were not mere subordinates to the federal government but had the power to interpret and determine the constitutionality of federal laws. They asserted the concept of "interposition," which stated that states could interpose themselves between the federal government and the citizens to protect their rights. While these resolutions did not have the force of law, they were significant in highlighting the ongoing debate over the balance of power between the federal government and the states.
For more such answers federal laws
https://brainly.com/question/25912245
#SPJ8
Which of the following is not a supercontinent that Ontario was
a part of at some point in it's history?
Group of answer choices
Nena
Rodinia
Iapetus
None of these answers are correct
Arctica
Arctica is not a supercontinent that Ontario wasa part of at some point in it's history.
A landmass that covers most or all of Earth's surface is known as a supercontinent. This means that the landmass that Africa and Eurasia formed could be called a supercontinent. Pangea is the most recent supercontinent to contain all of Earth's major landmasses, including those that are probably most well-known. Approximately 200 million years ago, during the late Paleozoic and early Mesozoic periods, this supercontinent known as Pangaea existed.
Plate tectonics broke up the Pangaea after this time period. The climate of the entire planet changed when Pangaea broke up.Pangaea split into two new continents, Laurasia and Gondwanaland, around 200 million years ago.
To learn about supercontinent
https://brainly.com/question/2490743
#SPJ4
The U.S. acquired territories in the Pacific and Caribbean using military force.
Decide if the following statement is True or False and explain why.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
The United States acquired territories in the Pacific and Caribbean through military force. During the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the U.S. engaged in a period of expansionism and imperialism, seeking to increase its influence and territorial holdings. This led to military interventions and conflicts, resulting in the acquisition of territories such as the Philippines, Guam, Puerto Rico, and Cuba. Notable examples include the Spanish-American War in 1898, which resulted in the U.S. gaining control over territories previously held by Spain.
define who was the Nicholas Brothers and their background and
how they became famous
The Nicholas Brothers were a dancing duo from the United States consisting of real-life siblings Fayard and Harold Nicholas. They Became famous through their appearances in several Hollywood movies, including Stormy Weather, Sun Valley Serenade, and The Pirate
They began by performing in the streets with their older siblings before eventually forming a tap dance act called "The Nicholas Kids."When they were performing at the famous Cotton Club in Harlem, they were discovered by bandleader Duke Ellington, who invited them to join his orchestra and take part in his revue Jump for Joy.
They were renowned for their signature "flash dancing" routines, which involved high-speed tapping and splits.The Nicholas Brothers were a groundbreaking act in the entertainment industry, as they were one of the first Black performers to achieve mainstream success and break down racial barriers in Hollywood.
They paved the way for other African American entertainers to follow in their footsteps and achieve similar levels of recognition and fame.Today, the Nicholas Brothers are remembered as pioneers of tap dance and icons of American popular culture.
They received numerous awards and accolades throughout their careers, including induction into the National Museum of Dance Hall of Fame and a Lifetime Achievement Award from the American Tap Dance Foundation.
Know more about Hollywood here:
https://brainly.com/question/32288337
#SPJ11
why it is important for fiji to have a relationship with both the PRC and ROC
Answer:
Fiji's relationship with both the People's Republic of China (PRC) and the Republic of China (ROC) is important for several reasons:
Economic benefits: Both the PRC and ROC are major economic powers, and having a relationship with both countries can help Fiji to increase its trade, investment, and tourism opportunities. This can lead to economic growth and job creation in Fiji.
Diplomatic leverage: Having a relationship with both the PRC and ROC allows Fiji to maintain diplomatic leverage and avoid taking sides in the ongoing political dispute between the two countries. This can help Fiji to maintain its neutrality and independence, and avoid being seen as aligned with any particular country or ideology.
Cultural exchange: Both China and Taiwan have rich cultural traditions and histories, and having a relationship with both countries can allow Fiji to benefit from cultural exchange and cooperation in areas such as education, language, and arts. This can help to promote mutual understanding and appreciation between Fiji and the two countries.
Regional stability: Fiji is an important player in the Pacific region, and having good relationships with both the PRC and ROC can help to promote regional stability and cooperation. This is particularly important given the strategic importance of the Pacific region and the increasing interest of major powers such as China in the region.
Overall, maintaining good relationships with both the PRC and ROC can bring a range of benefits to Fiji, including economic growth, diplomatic leverage, cultural exchange, and regional stability.
Explanation:
According to the primary sources, why did Hoover and Long both criticize Roosevelt's New Deal from different political perspectives? What did those political attacks on the New Deal suggest about the New Deal? What types of Americans in the 1930s might have been interested in Hoover's view? What types of Americans in the 1930s might have been interested in Long's plan?
From different political vantage points, Hoover and Long both denounced Roosevelt's New Deal because of the way it was being implemented.
Hoover worried the New Deal would eventually result in deficit spending because it required an excessive amount of government participation. A political realignment brought about by the New Deal resulted in the Democratic Party being the majority, with its foundation in progressive ideologies, the South, big city machinery, and the newly powerful labour unions.
It altered the presidency's authority, the presidency's position in the economy, and the way the American people interacted with their government. Some women had the chance to advance women's rights and broaden their political power thanks to the New Deal.
Know more about New Deal here
https://brainly.com/question/29888555
#SPJ4
when president truman desegregated the military, which branch was the last to comply?
The Marine Corps was the last branch to comply when President Truman desegregated the military.
In 1948, President Harry S. Truman issued Executive Order 9981, which called for the desegregation of the United States Armed Forces. While all branches of the military eventually complied with the order, the Marine Corps was the last branch to fully implement desegregation. The Marine Corps had a reputation for being more resistant to racial integration compared to the other branches. It took several years for the Marine Corps to fully integrate its units and facilities.
The resistance to desegregation within the Marine Corps was attributed to a combination of cultural factors, internal dynamics, and resistance from some of its leadership. However, by the mid-1950s, the Marine Corps had successfully integrated its units, ensuring racial equality within the military as mandated by President Truman's executive order.
To know more about President Truman , click here.
https://brainly.com/question/11206178
#SPJ4
Which time period were Dinosaurs present on earth?
Cenozoic Era
Hadean Eon
Mesozoic Era
Precambrian
In which time period did large mammals first appear?
Mesozoic Era
Cenozoic Era
Paleozoic Era
Precambrian
1. Mesozoic Era time period were Dinosaurs present on earth. 2. Cenozoic Era time period did large mammals first appear. The 'Age of Dinosaurs' (the Mesozoic Era) spanned three geologic time periods (the Triassic, Jurassic, and Cretaceous).
Various dinosaur species existed during each of these three time periods. The oldest known haramiyids date back to the Triassic period, 208 million years ago. If they are actual mammals, mammal origins must go back at least that long; if not, the oldest known animal is 178 million years old, deep into the Jurassic period.
The oldest mammaliaform ecological radiation occurred between 190 and 163 million years ago, with the breakup of the supercontinent Pangaea, and involved the first genuine mammals and their closest relatives.
To learn more about Dinosaurs, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/7277813
#SPJ4
After reading "An Act for Suppressiong Outlying Slaves," describe the reasons the General Assembly was motivated to create slave codes, and explain how this document provides evidence of the creation of a race-based class society in the colony.
Answer:
An Act for Suppressing Outlying Slaves" was a slave code passed by the Virginia General Assembly in 1691 that aimed to regulate the behavior of enslaved people in the colony. The primary motivations behind the creation of slave codes were economic and social.
Economically, enslaved people were a valuable commodity for plantation owners and other landowners in the colony. They provided free labor and were essential to the success of the tobacco and other agricultural industries. Slave codes were designed to protect the economic interests of slaveowners by regulating the behavior of enslaved people and preventing them from running away or engaging in other behaviors that might harm their owners' profits.
Socially, slave codes were created to maintain the social order of the colony and prevent enslaved people from challenging the power of their owners. The colonial elite saw enslaved people as a potential threat to social stability, and slave codes were designed to prevent enslaved people from organizing, rebelling, or otherwise challenging the social hierarchy.
The Act for Suppressing Outlying Slaves provides evidence of the creation of a race-based class society in the colony in several ways. First, the act explicitly targets enslaved people of African descent, demonstrating that race was a key factor in determining who was subject to the provisions of the law. This demonstrates that race was used as a tool to create a distinct social class of enslaved people who were subject to different laws and regulations than white people.
Second, the act establishes a system of surveillance and control over enslaved people, demonstrating the power dynamic between slaveowners and enslaved people. The act requires enslaved people to carry passes and gives anyone the right to capture and return enslaved people who are found outside of their owner's property. This system of control reinforces the power dynamic between slaveowners and enslaved people and reinforces the idea that enslaved people are property rather than human beings.
Overall, the Act for Suppressing Outlying Slaves provides evidence of the creation of a race-based class society in the colony by demonstrating the ways in which race was used to create a distinct social class of enslaved people and establish a power dynamic between slaveowners and enslaved people.
Explanation:
The fall of the Byzantine Empire to the Ottoman Turks (1453) prompted Spain and Portugal to
Question 3 options:
A)
expand the Catholic Inquisition into the Middle East
B)
extend religious tolerance to Muslim peoples
C)
reform their political systems
D)
seek new trade routes to East Asia
The fall of the Byzantine Empire to the Ottoman Turks (1453) prompted Spain and Portugal toseek new trade routes to East Asia
What happened with the fall of the ByzantineThe fall of the Byzantine Empire to the Ottoman Turks in 1453 had a significant impact on the European powers of the time, including Spain and Portugal. The event marked the end of the Byzantine Empire, which had served as a major hub for trade between Europe and Asia, particularly the lucrative Silk Road trade routes.
With the Ottoman Turks controlling the traditional overland trade routes to the East, such as those through the Middle East and Central Asia, European powers, including Spain and Portugal, were cut off from these valuable trade networks. This prompted them to seek alternative routes to access the riches of Asia, particularly East Asia.
Read more on Byzantine here https://brainly.com/question/1446842
#SPJ1
Which of the following statements accurately describes Mary McLeodBethune?A. She was a prominent supporter of the TownsendPlan.B. She was a key figure in the NYA.C. She was EleanorRoosevelt's personal secretary.D. She was a labor organizer
Mary McLeod Bethune was a key figure in the NYA. It was brought into the world in South Carolina in 1875 to guardians who had once been slaves.
The correct option (B) is correct.
She established the Public Committee of Negro Ladies in 1935, and she likewise turned into a guide to President Franklin D. Roosevelt. She turned into an individual from President Roosevelt's Dark Bureau, a gathering of unmistakable dark pioneers who exhorted him on racial issues.
She additionally worked with First Woman Eleanor Roosevelt to increment open positions for African Americans. Bethune trusted in the force of training to completely change people. She established the Daytona Typical and Modern Organization for Negro Young Ladies, which later became Bethune-Cookman School.
Learn more about Mary McLeod Bethune:
https://brainly.com/question/30418893
#SPJ4