Speaker 1 most clearly expresses a politically liberal response to the energy crisis of the 1970s by advocating for alternative energy sources. So, the correct choice is option A.
Speaker 1 is the most clearly expressing a politically liberal response to the energy crisis of the 1970s.
They argue that the economy's heavy reliance on oil is problematic and propose developing alternative energy sources like solar, hydroelectric, and wind power. This viewpoint aligns with liberal values of promoting renewable and sustainable energy solutions to reduce dependence on fossil fuels and address environmental concerns.
Speaker 4 also suggests exploring various energy options, including ethanol, biodiesel, clean coal, and nuclear power. While these options may encompass a broader range of energy sources, it does not explicitly emphasize renewable and sustainable alternatives as strongly as Speaker 1.
On the other hand, Speaker 2 focuses on increasing North American oil production through methods like fracking, offshore drilling, and drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. This approach is not aligned with a politically liberal response, as it prioritizes expanding fossil fuel extraction rather than transitioning to cleaner energy sources.
Speaker 3 suggests supporting businesses in oil-producing regions of the United States, which does not address the broader goal of reducing oil dependency or promoting alternative energy solutions.
In conclusion, Speaker 1, advocating for the development of alternative energy sources, most clearly expresses a politically liberal response to the energy crisis of the 1970s.
For more questions on energy crisis
https://brainly.com/question/29763772
#SPJ8