The way that you would have to keep an open mind and determine the innocence of the defendant would be by:
Having it in your head that some one else could be guiltyBy trying to put yourself in the shoes of the defendantBy trying to put away all forms of biases, prejudices that you may have concerning the person especially based on their race and their tribe.What is the role of a juror?This is a person that is serving on what is called jury duty. The juror has to help to establish if a person is guilty based on the evidence and the facts that are presented in a case.
To uphold the presumption of innocence until proven guilty, one has to wait to get the evidences from the courtroom before they can determine if guilty or not. Stay away from hearsay and only make sure that there decision is based on evidence and facts.
Try to do away from all preconceived notions that may come to mind about the person/defendant that is on trial. Else this may affect the way you make their verdict on the case.
Read more on jury duty here:
https://brainly.com/question/4559559
#SPJ1
You are at a music concert and a close friend of yours ( someone you have known most of your life and trust implicitly) hands you a powder that he has obtained. H
The above scenario presents a case wherein a person in real life experiences the sort of conflict that are usually presented in fiction or novels where in one is torn between loyalty to their friend of many years and protecting themselves form legal action by the state. It is of course assumed here that the powered is an illegal substance.
How would one handle the above scenario?Regardless of who the person is, the best bet is to report the situation to the Police.
Siding with the law is the safest thing to do when there is a conflict and a dilemma such as is presented above.
It is to be noted that the moment the friend put that substance in ones hand, they have put one in a very dangerous situation, which no good friend should do.
Learn more about legal actions:
https://brainly.com/question/14687238?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ1
Where is the headquarters for the United Nations located?
London, England
New York, United States
Moscow, Russia
Dubai, United Arab Emirates
THE SCENARIO
Alice visited her local police station in response to Detective Barker’s request that Alice meet with him at her convenience to discuss a series of burglaries that had occurred in a neighborhood near Alice’s home. Though he suspected that Alice had committed the burglaries, Detective Barker explained that she was free to leave the station at any time; that she could take breaks from speaking with Barker whenever she wished; and that, regardless of what she said to Barker, Alice would not be arrested that day.
At the outset of her conversation with Barker, Alice repeatedly denied any involvement in the burglaries. In response, Barker truthfully told Alice that several pieces of physical evidence implicating her in the crimes had been collected from the burglarized residences, and questioned Alice about her whereabouts on the nights the burglaries occurred. Alice then asked Barker whether he could “get her a good deal” from the district attorney if she confessed her involvement in the crimes. Barker responded by stating that the district attorney was responsible for making decisions regarding potential charges or plea bargains, but that Barker believed that “honesty is always the best policy.” Alice then proceeded to make incriminating statements regarding her participation in the burglaries.
Alice has filed a motion to suppress the statements she made at the station.
QUESTIONS TO BE ANSWERED
1. Was Alice being interrogated at the station?
2. Was Alice in custody?
3. Was the officer required to give Alice the Miranda warnings?
4. Was Alice compelled to confess or were her statements voluntary?
Explain why or why not to each question in a minimum of 100 words
YES! Alice was being interrogated at the station. This is evident in paragraph 2, lines 3 to 8. ... Alice then asked Barker whether he could “get her a good deal” from the district attorney if she confessed her involvement in the crimes. YES! Alice was in custody. This is also evident in paragraph 1. ...Though he suspected that Alice had committed the burglaries, Detective Barker explained that she was free to leave the station at any time...
What are the answers to other questions?3. No, there was no mirinda warning! The officer was not required to give Alice the Miranda warnings. No evidence of such is found through out the text.
4a. No, Alice was not compelled to confess. Even when the officer knew she was involved in the burglaries, he gave her the the chance to speak at her will. This is evident as well in paragraph 1. ...Though he suspected that Alice had committed the burglaries, Detective Barker explained that she was free to leave the station at any time...
4b. Hence, her statements were made voluntarily. This is also found in paragraph 2. ...Barker responded by stating that the district attorney was responsible for making decisions regarding potential charges or plea bargains, but that Barker believed that “honesty is always the best policy.” Alice then proceeded to make incriminating statements regarding her participation in the burglaries.
Therefore, the correct answers are given above
learn more about mirinda warning: https://brainly.com/question/2242029
#SPJ1
Do you think there should be a data base for everyone's DNA ? If so then why?
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
Given set data base has every new born child's DNA towards every passing of every other. Not meaning habing a crimjnal record puts blood and suliva but preamble DNA from birth, now rather than having to point match on criminal data, rather pre-set DNA data base on every human living or non-living.
Properly deviding DNA base still into split sections for criminal records amd clean records where clean record's are rather added/stamped when found guilty in the court of law, but then having all possible DNA sample at the touch of a button (rather should i say match) pre-liminates playing detective and running around following leads, ensuring closure towards deceased members familiy and aswell as eliminating wrongful imprisonment of non guilty members that adds unnecessary cost and reclurces towrards goverment funds etc.
Having "system that works, why fix" is not as having a system that continuously improves and sustains a flawless lrocedure rather than groping at the mids of a cold case in the hope that somewhere a light switch gets turned or a whistleblower apears is high waist of reacources and complete over kill. Given we are in a modern time where tech constantly improves to ease the human race, why not sustain a even rise in our modern living standards and consecutive growth in a that's even the slightest of possibilities.
Which of the following represents a benefit of the Second Amendment to citizens of the United States?
It allows citizens to organize into groups for peaceful protests.
It frees communities from crime.
It helps citizens provide a defense against foreign invaders.
It provides for every citizen to have a trial by jury.
Answer:
It is C. It helps citizens provide a defense against foreign invaders.
Explanation:
Answer: C: It helps citizens provide a defense against foreign invaders.
Explanation:
what is one example of the government limiting rights to protect the rights of others
Answer:
The government does not allow the media to publish false claims about public officials.
Explanation:
It's a serious business, journalism. A journalist is required to report the news impartially and objectively. Since people will believe what they read in the news, the reporter has a moral duty to convey the news objectively and without any coercion. He or she is unable to undermine their credibility. He must take care when determining if information concerning a public official is incorrect because of this. The fact that the government forbids the media from publishing false information on public officials is one instance of how the government restricts individual rights in order to preserve the rights of others. The reporter will get into problems if he makes assertions that he hasn't verified or doesn't have the evidence to back them up.
A driver with a false sense of confidence feels that he is...
A. not in control.
B. in control of some things.
C. in total control.
Answer:
A False Sense Of Confidence Would Be Not Be NOT Believing In Yourself. We Can Conclude The Driver Would Probably Be Recklessly.
A Would Be Your Answer, He Trusts Himself But It's Reckless if he does something.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
12. Less than 40 percent of teens have used marijuana within the past year
A. O True
B. O False
Answer: Its A
Explanation:
can i get a learners permit without taking drivers education in North Carolina?
Answer: yes
Explanation: assuming you mean the high school class.. if u mean at the dmv.. u just gotta pass the test
Research a criminal case that was resolved through plea bargaining, and explain the facts of the case. Weighing the evidence and the alleged offense, write about what you would have done if you were the defendant. Also, analyze and discuss your thoughts on the benefits and drawbacks of plea bargains.
A criminal case that was resolved through plea bargaining was the Bradshaw v. Stumpf (2005)
If it was me, i would have argue in respect to Stumpf , in his appeal to the Supreme Court, that the prosecutor is one who has unfairly used theories that are known to be vey inconsistent to prove that both he and Wesley both committed the crime.
The benefits of plea bargains are:
It gives soft justice for those who are found guilty.It helps to remove criminals off the streetsThe drawbacks of plea bargains.
It can put innocent people into prison for false reasons. It alters the efficiency of the criminal justice system.What was the Bradshaw v. Stumpf case?In the case,"
The court was said to have concluded that Stumpf is one that has pleaded guilty to aggravated murder without knowing that particular intent to cause death.
Hence, If it was me, i would have argue in respect to Stumpf , in his appeal to the Supreme Court, that the prosecutor is one who has unfairly used theories that are known to be vey inconsistent to prove that both he and Wesley both committed the crime.
Learn more about plea bargaining from
https://brainly.com/question/19557127
#SPJ1
Which of the following statements describes a general perspective of Latino parents?
They believe early childhood education is best done in the home.
They believe early childhood education is beneficial for their children.
They believe early childhood education is only beneficial for male students.
They do not believe early childhood education is beneficial for their children.
A general perspective of Latino parents is option(a)They believe early childhood education is best done in the home.
Latino parents are known for being strict, somewhat intrusive, and always have their children's best interests in mind. Family is the foundation of our culture and what defines each of us as individuals. In Latino culture, the family is seen as the most significant social group. It affects how its members perceive and act in relation to the outside environment. Latinas/os consider themselves to be the outside face of their family.
Inadequate participation in early care and education (ECE) and preschool programs is another factor in Latino children's lack of preparation for school. 5,6 Several initiatives have been launched in recent years to promote kindergarten readiness and lay the groundwork for impoverished Latino kids to succeed academically, find work, and earn more money.
To know more about Latino refer to: https://brainly.com/question/28148083
#SPJ1
Your friend quits work to go back to school and obtain another degree. After he graduates, he is only able to find part time work at McDonalds for the first few years. While he is working at McDonalds he is ____________________.
Question 5 options:
Frictionally unemployed
Seasonally unemployed
Cyclically unemployed
Structurally unemployed
Managing office politics falls under the main HR manager responsibility of.....?
The correct option is D. Managing office politics falls under the main HR manager's responsibility of employee advocacy.
Office politics can be stopped from becoming toxic through human resources. In actuality, HR is ideally suited to promote a joyful and effective workplace. The impact of office politics should be kept to a minimum.
How does workplace politics occur in an organization?Office politics develops when staff members abuse their authority to attract unwarranted attention and popularity at work. Employees engage in office politics just to harm the reputation of a colleague in order to get advantages and win favor with their superiors.
The complicated social structure of a workplace is referred to as office politics. It involves employees pursuing their own objectives by abusing their positions of authority, influence, and delegation. Everyone has a unique job to play within the microcosm of any business.
Learn more about HR manager responsibility here:
https://brainly.com/question/25806768
#SPJ1
Answer:
B. Service
Explanation:
Hope this helps :)
Select four types of information that should be included in documentation.
client’s favorite restaurants
client’s favorite restaurants
client progress and outcomes
client progress and outcomes
exact services received by the client
exact services received by the client
client’s educational plans
client’s educational plans
television shows the client likes
television shows the client likes
client’s food preferences
client’s food preferences
program information
program information
client’s history and needs
client’s history and needs
The four types of information that should be included in documentation of the clients are
exact services received by the clientclient’s educational plansprogram informationclient’s history and needsWhat is a client documentation?This refers to the documentation that contains a Service Provider's output to client group of the Services including the regulatory forms, filings, reports, records receipts, invoices, correspondence, files, notes, plans, policies etc.
Also, the client documentation helps to understand out client better as well as to make decisions on marketing issues.
Hence, four types of information that should be included in documentation of the clients are exact services received by the client, client’s educational plans, program information and client’s history and needs.
Therefore, Option C, D, G, H are correct.
Read more about client documentation
brainly.com/question/1218796
#SPJ1
Major categories in which laws regulate employment relationships
include all following EXCEPT?
A. Wages and work hours
B. Workers compensation and unemployment
C. Contract terms
D. Health and safety
Answer:
Contract terms
Explanation:
A changing space is a space or area condition in which the level of risk is increasing. True false
Changing space is a space or area condition in which the level of risk is increasing. The statement is True.
Determine the likelihood that a person may require more extensive support, residential placement away from the natural family home or support within the natural home. This is known as the level of risk. A standardized risk assessment tool is used by DDDS to determine the level of risk.
The word "level of risk" refers to how big a risk is when combined with the likelihood of its outcomes. The term "level of risk" refers to the size of a risk as reflected by a risk priority number.
Learn more about the level of risk here:
https://brainly.com/question/14378278
#SPJ1
Do you think defendants should have to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt to be convicted? Or do you think a lesser burden of proof, like the preponderance of evidence in needed in civil cases, is more appropriate?
I think defendants should have to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt to be convicted is more appropriate.
Who is a Defendant?This is referred to as the individual or group which have been accused of breaking the law and is being tried in court.
It is more appropriate for the defendants to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt to be convicted because the jury will employ the use of evidences and testimonies in other to give a verdict. This ensures fair judgement and prevent innocent from being punished unjustly.
Read more about Defendant here https://brainly.com/question/7315287
#SPJ1
Imagine you want to convince your congressman to support a bill to create jobs.
Which statement is most likely to win his support for the bill?
The bill would increase the number of people in low-paying jobs.
The bill might help employ more teachers and police officers.
The bill could lead to more debt to foreign countries.
The bill would make up for bills he sponsored that failed in the past.
Answer:
the bill will increase the number of people in low paying jobs