Write 1000 words about Employment law in UK by using Gibbs
Reflective model.

Common law is often referred to as case law and judge-made law .

Option e is correct .

Common law is a system of law based on judicial judgments and precedents. It is developed and refined by the application of legal principles and arguments by judges in adjudicating a particular case. When judges interpret and apply law to resolve disputes, their decisions become part of common law and provide binding precedent for future litigation involving similar points of fact or law. Set.

The term "case law" reflects the fact that common law is built on the outcomes of specific cases decided by courts. Judges' decisions in these cases serve as precedents that guide future court decisions and shape the development of law.  

Hence, Option e is correct .

To know more about case law visit :

https://brainly.com/question/30580233

#SPJ4

The concept in which a central authority figure intervenes to prevent and punish wrongs is called rule of law.

The rule of law refers to the concept that everyone in a society is subject to the law, including people who are in power. The rule of law is a principle that governs the law's use, authority, and interpretation. It ensures that every person in a society is governed by the same law, regardless of their social status or position in society.

The rule of law establishes a fundamental framework of legal protections and rights that maintain order and ensure the individual's fundamental freedom. It is the backbone of every civil society, and it is important because it ensures that power is not arbitrarily wielded by the few, resulting in a lack of accountability, corruption, and oppression.

TO know more about intervenes:

https://brainly.com/question/14545070

#SPJ11

TRUE. Reasonable people can indeed expect to disagree about optimal solutions to ethical dilemmas.

Ethical dilemmas often involve complex and multifaceted considerations, such as conflicting values, moral principles, cultural beliefs, and personal experiences. Different individuals may prioritize these factors differently and arrive at varying conclusions regarding what constitutes the most ethical course of action.

Additionally, ethical dilemmas may lack clear-cut solutions, leaving room for interpretation and differing perspectives. As a result, it is reasonable to expect that people with different backgrounds, perspectives, and ethical frameworks may hold divergent opinions on the optimal resolution of ethical dilemmas.

Learn more about ethical dilemmas here:

https://brainly.com/question/28221102

#SPJ11

The Supreme Court uses the "Lemon test" in dealing with religious establishment cases. The Lemon test is a three-pronged framework derived from the landmark Supreme Court case Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971).

The three prongs of the Lemon test are as follows: The government's action must have a secular purpose. The primary effect of the government's action must neither advance nor inhibit religion. The government's action must not result in excessive entanglement between government and religion.

The purpose of the Lemon test is to determine whether a government action violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which prohibits the government from establishing or promoting a particular religion. To pass the Lemon test, a government action must satisfy all three prongs. If any one of the prongs is not met, the action may be considered unconstitutional.

The Lemon test provides a framework for the Supreme Court to evaluate cases involving government actions that potentially violate the separation of church and state. It helps maintain a balance between religious freedom and preventing government endorsement or establishment of religion.

Learn more about Lemon test here:

https://brainly.com/question/29618692

#SPJ4

All of the following influence the selection of federal judges and Supreme Court justices EXCEPT campaign contributions. Correct option is A.

The Judiciary is the third organ of the government. It has the responsibility to apply the laws to  specific cases and settle all  controversies. The real ‘ meaning of law ’ is what the judges decide during  the course of giving their judgments in  colorful cases. From the citizen’s point of view, Judiciary  is the most important organ of the government because it acts as their  protection against the  possible  surpluses of legislative and administrative organs. part of Judiciary as the guardian-  protection  of the constitution and the abecedarian rights of the people makes it more respectable than other  two organs.  There are  colorful  situations of bar in India – different types of courts, each with varying  powers depending on the  league and  governance bestowed upon them. They form a strict  scale  of  significance, in line with the order of the courts in which they sit, with the Supreme Court of  India at the top, followed by High Courts of  separate  countries with  quarter judges sitting  in District Courts and Adjudicators of Second Class and Civil Judge( Junior Division) at the   nethermost

To know more about federal judges:

https://brainly.com/question/30591476

#SPJ4

The statement "Lawmakers who vote as delegates believe that each question they face should be decided on its own merits and not based on personal feelings or the beliefs of their constituents" is True.

A delegate is a person sent or authorized to represent others, particularly in a political context. A delegate is a representative who is chosen to attend a convention, conference, or meeting on behalf of a group of people or an organization.

As per this definition, lawmakers who vote as delegates believe that each issue they face should be resolved on its own merits rather than on their own personal views or the beliefs of their constituents.

Therefore, the given statement is true that lawmakers who vote as delegates believe that each question they face should be decided on its own merits and not based on personal feelings or the beliefs of their constituents.

Hence, the statement "Lawmakers who vote as delegates believe that each question they face should be decided on its own merits and not based on personal feelings or the beliefs of their constituents" is True.

Read more about Lawmakers at https://brainly.com/question/29313404

#SPJ11

In Texas, the statute of limitations for assault with a deadly weapon or gun, with no injury to the person, is two years.

Statutes of limitations are legal time limits for the prosecutor to bring charges against the accused. The Texas Code of Criminal Procedure contains the statute of limitations for felony and misdemeanor offenses in Texas. They have different statutes of limitations.

According to the Texas Penal Code Section 22.01, assault is defined as a situation in which a person intentionally or recklessly causes bodily harm to another individual. Additionally, it occurs when someone intentionally threatens another person with bodily harm. The offense of aggravated assault in Texas is defined under Section 22.02 of the Texas Penal Code. In the state of Texas, assault with a deadly weapon or firearm without causing injury is a third-degree felony, and it carries a sentence of 2 to 10 years in jail.

To know more about Texas:

https://brainly.com/question/29874906

#SPJ11

The statement '' Kant acknowledges that the consequences of our actions are ultimately our own moral responsibility '' is false because moral action should be guided by a sense of duty and should be conducted with respect for moral laws.

Immanuel Kant's ethical theory, known as deontological ethics, emphasizes the moral value of action based on the observance of principles and rules, rather than the consequences of the action.  Instead, it emphasizes the importance of acting according to moral principles and intentions, regardless of the consequences.

Kant's moral philosophy focuses on the intention of action rather than the consequences of action. He maintains that moral conduct is that which is carried out according to universal moral laws which he formulates as categorical imperatives. The categorical imperative states that individuals should act only on principles that can be universally and consistently adopted.

To know more about moral responsibility visit :

https://brainly.com/question/32359905

#SPJ4

The given assertion "Statute law (or legislation) is sanctioned by Parliament through a few phases. As Queen Elizabeth II's role (and the Governor General) is largely ceremonial, Roya." is false because Statute law or legislation is enacted by Parliament through several stages, which typically involve the introduction of a bill, debates, committee reviews, and voting.

The final approval is given by the head of state, who is the monarch or the Governor General acting on behalf of the monarch, depending on the country.

However, their role in this process is largely ceremonial and symbolic. The actual power to enact legislation lies with the elected representatives in Parliament.

Learn more about legislation:

https://brainly.com/question/29894072

#SPJ4

A practical legal suggestion regarding antitrust laws would be to enhance enforcement and scrutiny of mergers and acquisitions in industries where consolidation may lead to reduced competition.

This can involve strengthening the resources and capabilities of antitrust agencies to effectively monitor and assess potential anti-competitive practices. Additionally, encouraging collaboration between domestic and international regulatory bodies can aid in addressing cross-border antitrust concerns. Implementing stricter penalties and fines for antitrust violations can serve as a deterrent and ensure compliance. Furthermore, promoting awareness and education about antitrust laws among businesses and consumers can foster a culture of fair competition and prevent anti-competitive behavior from taking place in the first place.

To know more about  antitrust laws :
https://brainly.com/question/8431756

#SPJ4

Prior to the Supreme Court ruling in Gitlow v. New York, the restrictions imposed by the Bill of Rights primarily applied to the federal government, rather than state governments.

The Bill of Rights, consisting of the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution, was ratified in 1791. Its purpose was to protect individual liberties and establish a set of rights that the federal government could not infringe upon. However, these rights were not initially interpreted as automatically binding upon state governments.

The concept of "incorporation" emerged over time through the Fourteenth Amendment's due process clause, which was ratified in 1868. The due process clause states that no state shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. Through various Supreme Court cases, such as Gitlow v.

Gitlow v. New York marked an important step in this process. Although the Court upheld the conviction of Benjamin Gitlow for distributing communist literature, it recognized that the First Amendment's protection of free speech applied to the states through the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

In summary, prior to the Gitlow v. New York ruling, the restrictions imposed by the Bill of Rights were primarily aimed at the federal government, and state governments were not automatically bound by its provisions. The process of incorporating the Bill of Rights' protections into state actions began to take shape with the Court's recognition

Learn more about Bill of Rights here

https://brainly.com/question/15996138

#SPJ11

Moral absolutism is a moral philosophy that postulates that there is a universal standard of morality that applies to everyone, at all times, and in all cultures.

Moral absolutists believe that there are absolute, objective truths and principles of morality that are inherent in the nature of the world and that can be discovered through reason. They believe that moral judgments are not merely subjective or relative to particular individuals, societies, or cultures but are grounded in objective facts about the world.

In other words, they hold that there are some things that are right or wrong, regardless of what anyone thinks or feels about them.  Moral absolutism has been criticized for its rigidity and inflexibility, which can lead to intolerance and dogmatism.

It can also be difficult to apply moral absolutes in practice, as the complexities of real-world situations often defy simplistic, black-and-white solutions. Nonetheless, moral absolutism continues to be a powerful and influential moral philosophy, particularly in religious and conservative circles.

Many people find comfort and guidance in the idea of a fixed and immutable moral order that transcends human subjectivity and provides a stable foundation for ethical decision-making.

Know more about philosophy here:

https://brainly.com/question/32939933

#SPJ11

In some jurisdictions, minors may have the ability to give consent for specific medical treatments or situations. The instances in which a minor can give consent for himself or herself for medical treatment can vary depending on local laws and regulations.

However, based on common legal principles, the following instances are generally recognized:

b. The minor can give consent for any venereal disease: In cases where a minor seeks treatment for a venereal disease (sexually transmitted infection), they may be able to give consent without parental involvement or consent.

c. The minor can give consent if he or she is lawfully married: In some jurisdictions, if a minor is lawfully married (typically with parental or guardian consent), they may be granted the legal authority to provide consent for their own medical treatment.

Learn more about jurisdictions here:

https://brainly.com/question/14179714

#SPJ11

Legitimate power is getting people to do things based on a position of authority.

The capacity to persuade or persuade others to take certain actions based on a position of authority or a recognized formal role is known as legitimate power. It comes from the idea that the person in charge has the right to control and make decisions regarding a particular area.

Hierarchical structures, organizational roles or official positions like those held by managers, supervisors or government officials frequently give rise to legitimate power. It results from the belief in a person legitimacy and acceptance of their right to use their positional authority to exert control or influence over others.

Learn more about legitimate power at:

brainly.com/question/29575208

#SPJ4

A complaint is legally sufficient if it appears to have violated a recognized legal right or caused harm to the plaintiff.

A clear statement of the facts, identification of the parties involved, and a description of the alleged wrongdoing are some of the crucial components that must be present in order to establish a legal cause of action. The complaint must state the legal grounds for the claim, citing any relevant statutes or laws and show a believable link between the defendant's actions and the plaintiff's injuries.

The plaintiff's requested relief or remedy must also be stated in the complaint. The basis for the court's consideration of the case, determination of jurisdiction and opportunity for the defendant to reply is a legally sufficient complaint.

Learn more about complaint at:

brainly.com/question/30584247

#SPJ4

The Exxon Valdez incident in 1989 illustrates the nature of human errors, the extent of environmental damage, and the aftermath of oil spills.

The Exxon Valdez incident occurred on March 24, 1989, when the Exxon Valdez, a tanker owned by Exxon Corporation, ran aground in Prince William Sound, Alaska. The incident resulted in the release of an estimated 11 million gallons of crude oil into the ocean.

This oil spill caused massive damage to the environment, which lasted for several decades. The incident also exposed the inadequacies in the oil spill response system and highlighted the need for better prevention measures.The nature of human errors

The Exxon Valdez incident was caused by human errors, primarily the captain's negligence. The captain, Joseph Hazelwood, was under the influence of alcohol when the incident occurred. He had also deviated from the designated shipping lane, and the vessel's radar system was turned off.

Know more about  environmental damage here:

https://brainly.com/question/28983601

#SPJ11

The character or condition of a person or a thing is known as its status. It refers to the character or condition of a person or a thing.

The option (A) is correct.

Status can encompass various aspects, including social, legal, or professional standing. Status can indicate one's position, role, or rank in society, organization, or a particular context. It can be influenced by factors such as education, occupation, wealth, social connections, or legal rights.

It often determines the privileges, rights, and responsibilities that a person has within a particular group or society. For example, someone with a high social status may have access to more resources, influence, and opportunities compared to someone with a lower social status.

Learn more about character:

https://brainly.com/question/29698597

#SPJ4

The primary origin of the American legal system is English law. Thus, option c is the correct answer.

English Common Law served as the foundation for the American legal system. The system of American jurisprudence is known as the Common Law system. This legal system is also used by Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom.

The origins of the Common Law system can be traced back to medieval England, where judges used traditional customs to decide cases. When written laws and statutes were introduced in England, these laws were enforced by royal courts, and the decisions made by the judges in these courts became precedents. This collection of judicial decisions eventually developed into the body of law known as English Common Law, which was then brought to the United States.

Learn more about American Legal System at: https://brainly.com/question/7694457

#SPJ11

Dicey, a renowned legal scholar. outlined three main principles of the rule of law.

Originally, there should be absolute supremacy of regular law, which means that all entities, including government officials, are subject to and must abide by the law. Secondly, the Constitution should be the result of the ordinary legislator process and should give the legal frame within which the government operates. Incipiently, individual rights should be defended by the ordinary law, and the courts should have the power of judicial review to insure that these rights aren't violated.

The principle of legitimacy, as set out by the rule of law, means that the law must be clear, accessible, and predictable, allowing individuals to understand and plan their conduct accordingly.

To learn More about Dicey:

https://brainly.com/question/12469633

#SPJ4

To protect yourself from third party claims, you must comply with laws and regulations.

Please ensure that you understand and comply with the relevant laws, regulations and industry standards that apply to your activities. This includes following security protocols, maintaining proper documentation, and meeting licensing or certification requirements.

Take appropriate precautions to prevent harm to others. This may include implementing safety measures, providing appropriate warnings and instructions, properly maintaining property and equipment, and regularly assessing and mitigating risks.

To know more about  lawsuit visit :

https://brainly.com/question/28521301

#SPJ4

The correct question is :

To protect yourself against a third party liability lawsuit, you must ______ .

The strategy of "moral suasion" was the use of moral arguments and persuasion to convince individuals and society to abolish slavery.

Most early abolitionists advocated this policy because they believed it would appeal to people's conscience and foster gradual change without resorting to violence.

However, its success was limited as it failed to bring about widespread and immediate abolition, leading many abolitionists to adopt more radical and direct approaches such as political activism and the Underground Railroad.

Moral suasion was a strategy used by early abolitionists to appeal to the conscience of Americans. The approach was the idea that slaveholders would voluntarily release their slaves once convinced that slavery was evil. This strategy of "moral suasion" was used in the hope of persuading slave owners to free their slaves. The strategy of "moral suasion" is the method that was used by early abolitionists to appeal to the conscience of Americans.

This tactic was based on the belief that slaveholders would voluntarily release their slaves if they were convinced that slavery was evil. Hence, the abolitionists attempted to convince slaveholders and the public at large that slavery was wrong and immoral. They emphasized that slavery was a violation of the principles of Christianity and the Declaration of Independence. It was hoped that by convincing enough people that slavery was immoral, it would gradually be abolished.

Learn more about moral suasion: https://brainly.com/question/28206962

#SPJ11

The Great Open Hand and Key symbolize justice, protection, and authority in Islamic architecture at the Alhambra.

Islamic architecture is rich with symbolism and the Great Open Hand and Key over the Justice Gate at the Alhambra is no exception. The open hand, also known as the Hand of Fatima or the Hamsa stands for blessings, protection and the banishment of evil. It stands for fairness and justice representing the ability of the law to defend the just and uphold justice. On the other hand, the key represents power, insight and access.

It stands for the key to knowledge, discernment, and discovering the mysteries of justice. The hand and key represent the concepts of justice, truth and divine power collectively, emphasizing the significance of upholding justice and seeking truth in the exercise of law. They act as a tangible reminder of the principles guiding a just and equitable society.

Learn more about Islamic architecture at:

brainly.com/question/30174373

#SPJ4

The federal judiciary comprises the Supreme Court of the United States, the U.S. Courts of Appeals, the U.S. District Courts, and other related entities. The chief decision-makers of the federal judiciary are the judges appointed by the President of the United States with the advice and consent of the U.S. Senate.

They are tasked with interpreting the law and deciding on cases that come before them. The Supreme Court of the United States is the highest court in the country, and its nine justices are the ultimate decision-makers for the federal judiciary. They have the power to interpret the Constitution and federal laws, and their decisions are binding on all other courts in the country. The Court also has the power of judicial review, which allows it to declare laws and actions of the other branches of government unconstitutional and therefore invalid. The U.S. Courts of Appeals and the U.S. District Courts are also important decision-makers in the federal judiciary. The judges on these courts are responsible for hearing cases at the appellate and trial levels, respectively. Their decisions are subject to review by higher courts, including the Supreme Court.

To know more about judiciary visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29804112

#SPJ11

In a liberal ideology, the core American value of "liberty" is often considered to be the most important.

The option (A) is correct.

Liberalism places a strong emphasis on individual freedoms and rights, valuing the ability of individuals to make choices and pursue their own interests without undue interference from the government or other external forces.

Liberty encompasses a range of individual liberties, including freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of assembly, and freedom of thought. Liberals believe that protecting and promoting these liberties is crucial for fostering a society that respects and values the autonomy and dignity of individuals.

Learn more about liberal ideology:

https://brainly.com/question/29525555

#SPJ4

One of the five philosophical principles that form the basis for the juvenile court movement states that​ the state is the​ "higher or ultimate​ parent" of the child. The correct option is B.

The idea that the state is the child's "higher or ultimate parent" is one of the five philosophical tenets on which the juvenile court movement is built. This principle embodies the idea that when parents or guardians are unable to adequately protect a child's best interests, the state has a duty to step in.

The juvenile court system was created with the idea that the state should take on the role of guiding and rehabilitating delinquent or at risk youth acting as a surrogate parent. The court seeks to give care, direction and support to children in need, promoting their welfare and assisting them in becoming accountable and law abiding members of society by viewing the state as the ultimate parent and treating it as such.

Learn more about juvenile court system at:

brainly.com/question/29589942

#SPJ4

The Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) requires the inclusion of race information on loan applications for monitoring purposes.

The Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA), a piece of federal legislation, stipulates that racial information must be disclosed on loan applications. Certain financial institutions are required by the HMDA to gather and report data on mortgage lending activities including details on the race, ethnicity, and gender of loan applicants. This requirement aims to ensure equal access to credit for everyone, regardless of race or ethnicity and to monitor and address any potential discriminatory lending practices.

Although the gathering of this data is mandated by law, it is crucial to remember that it is prohibited for lenders to use race as a factor in approving or rejecting a loan. To encourage fair lending practices, the data gathered under the HMDA is used for regulatory and oversight purposes.

Learn more about Home Mortgage Disclosure Act at:

brainly.com/question/14753511

#SPJ4

A form of alternative dispute resolution that is legally binding at least one party is arbitration.

Arbitration is an alternative dispute resolution method that at least one party must abide by the law. In arbitration a dispute is presented to one or more neutral parties, known as arbitrators, who then render a legally binding decision. The parties agree to abide by the arbitrator's ruling which is typically founded on the arguments and supporting evidence put forth.

A contract or judicial order may require arbitration or it may be chosen voluntarily by the parties. It is frequently used in commercial disputes, labor disputes and various other areas of law and is thought of as a substitute for litigation. The arbitrator's decision is legally binding and serves as a binding settlement of the conflict.

Learn more about alternative dispute resolution at:

brainly.com/question/30327973

#SPJ4

The armorer or weapon specialist assists firers with weapon-related problems.

Armorer or weapon specialists play a crucial role in assisting firers with weapon-related problems. These highly skilled professionals are knowledgeable about various types of firearms and possess expertise in their maintenance, operation, and troubleshooting. When firers encounter issues with their weapons, such as malfunctions or performance inconsistencies, armorers are the go-to individuals for resolving these problems.

Armorer assistance is multifaceted. Firstly, they can diagnose and repair mechanical issues that may arise with firearms. Through their comprehensive understanding of weapon systems, they can identify the root cause of malfunctions and implement necessary repairs, ensuring the firearms are in optimal working condition.

Secondly, armorers are proficient in conducting routine maintenance on firearms. This involves cleaning, lubricating, and inspecting the weapons to prevent potential problems before they occur. By adhering to proper maintenance protocols, armorers can significantly enhance the reliability and longevity of firearms, minimizing the likelihood of weapon-related issues during critical situations.

Lastly, armorers provide guidance and training to firers on proper weapon handling and operation. They can offer valuable insights into best practices, safety protocols, and techniques for improving accuracy and efficiency. This knowledge empowers firers to develop a deeper understanding of their weapons, enabling them to address minor issues independently and make informed decisions during weapon-related challenges.

In summary, the armorer or weapon specialist is the primary resource for assisting firers with weapon-related problems. Their expertise encompasses mechanical repairs, routine maintenance, and training, ensuring that firearms are functional, reliable, and properly utilized. By leveraging their skills and knowledge, armorers contribute to the overall effectiveness and safety of firers in various operational contexts

Learn more about Weapon Related Problems:

brainly.com/question/24150467

#SPJ11

The best defense that a CPA (Certified Public Accountant) can assert against common law litigation by a stockholder claiming fraud based on an unqualified opinion on materially misstated financial statements would be: Lack of gross negligence.

While each option may have some relevance, asserting the lack of gross negligence would be the most effective defense in this scenario. In a fraud claim, the burden of proof lies with the plaintiff to establish that the CPA engaged in intentional or reckless misconduct. By asserting the lack of gross negligence, the CPA can argue that they did not exhibit a severe degree of negligence or intentional wrongdoing in conducting the audit. This defense acknowledges that there may have been misstatements, but asserts that they were not the result of the CPA's intentional or reckless actions. Other defenses such as contributory negligence, a disclaimer in the engagement letter, or lack of due diligence may have limited applicability or provide weaker grounds for defense in a fraud claim.

Learn more about gross negligence here:

https://brainly.com/question/28288330

#SPJ11

To provide safe and competent care within their scope of practice, while upholding professional standards and advocating for patients is the most significant role for nurses.

According to state nurse practice laws and governing bodies the primary responsibility of nurses is to provide communities, families and individuals with safe, competent care. Within their area of expertise, nurses are in charge of planning, implementing and evaluating patient care.

In addition to collaborating with other healthcare professionals they are expected to uphold professional standards and advocate for their patients rights and well being.

In order to provide care that is supported by the latest scientific research, nurses must also follow all applicable laws and ethical standards, maintain patient confidentiality and regularly update their knowledge and abilities.

Learn more about state nurse practice laws at:

brainly.com/question/32372786

#SPJ4