Answer: Answer:B. That the interests of white Americans are more important than the
interests of minorities
Explanation:
Britain would now seize vessels carrying goods for Germany where ever they were found. Germany, on May 7, 1915 torpedoed the British luxury liner _______________off the coast the neutral American flag, but it actually carried 4200 cases of small arms ammunition and 1250 Shrapnel cases.
“Titanic”
“Lusitania”
“Queen Mary”
“Americana”
Germany, on May 7, 1915 torpedoed the British luxury liner “Lusitania off the coast the neutral American flag
The sinking of the LusitaniaThe sinking of the Lusitania was a significant event during World War I. The ship, a British ocean liner, was travelling from New York to Liverpool, England, when it was torpedoed by a German submarine on May 7, 1915.
The reason the Germans targeted the Lusitania was that they believed it was carrying military supplies for the Allies, which it was, hidden in its cargo. The ship was indeed carrying munitions among its cargo, but it was also carrying civilian passengers.
When the torpedo hit the ship, it sank quickly. Of the nearly 2,000 people on board, more than 1,100 died, including 128 Americans. The loss of American lives in the attack led to significant outcry in the United States and helped shift public opinion against Germany.
Read more on The Lusitania here https://brainly.com/question/28007062
#SPJ1
Which speaker is most clearly expressing a politically liberal response to the energy crisis of the 1970s?
Speaker 1: Our economy is overly dependent on oil. We need to develop alternative energy sources such as solar, hydroelectric, and wind power.
Speaker 2: Our economy is overly dependent on foreign oil. We need to develop more North American oil production by fracking, drilling offshore, and drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.
Speaker 3: Our economy is overly dependent on foreign oil. The government needs to do everything possible to support businesses in oil-producing regions of the United States such as Texas and Alaska.
Speaker 4: Our economy is overly dependent on oil. We need to explore all energy options, including ethanol, biodiesel, clean coal, and even nuclear power.
A Speaker 1
B. Speaker 4
C. Speaker 3
D. Speaker 2
Speaker 1 most clearly expresses a politically liberal response to the energy crisis of the 1970s by advocating for alternative energy sources. So, the correct choice is option A.
Speaker 1 is the most clearly expressing a politically liberal response to the energy crisis of the 1970s.
They argue that the economy's heavy reliance on oil is problematic and propose developing alternative energy sources like solar, hydroelectric, and wind power. This viewpoint aligns with liberal values of promoting renewable and sustainable energy solutions to reduce dependence on fossil fuels and address environmental concerns.
Speaker 4 also suggests exploring various energy options, including ethanol, biodiesel, clean coal, and nuclear power. While these options may encompass a broader range of energy sources, it does not explicitly emphasize renewable and sustainable alternatives as strongly as Speaker 1.
On the other hand, Speaker 2 focuses on increasing North American oil production through methods like fracking, offshore drilling, and drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. This approach is not aligned with a politically liberal response, as it prioritizes expanding fossil fuel extraction rather than transitioning to cleaner energy sources.
Speaker 3 suggests supporting businesses in oil-producing regions of the United States, which does not address the broader goal of reducing oil dependency or promoting alternative energy solutions.
In conclusion, Speaker 1, advocating for the development of alternative energy sources, most clearly expresses a politically liberal response to the energy crisis of the 1970s.
For more questions on energy crisis
https://brainly.com/question/29763772
#SPJ8