Answer:
It can be alcohol abuse or alcoholism.
Because teens can obtain tobacco illegally, ____ are being removed from unsupervised areas.
Answer: Cigarrette Machines.
Explanation: The Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (TCA) of 2009 included a provision effective in 2010 that banned tobacco / cigarrette vending machine sales from unsupervised areas, with the exception of adult-only facilities.
Which statement accurately summarizes the impact of the Miranda v.
Arizona decision?
*
5 points
It incorporated the right to legal counsel, as protected under the Sixth Amendment,
to state and local governments.
OIt incorporated the Fourth Amendment to state and local governments.
It increased states' power to restrict freedom of speech when it is shown to increase
the danger to public safety.
It required that police officers inform suspects under arrest of their Fifth and Sixth
Amendment rights.
The statement that accurately summarizes the impact of the Miranda v. Arizona decision is It required that police officers inform suspects under arrest of their Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights.
What was declared in the Miranda v. Arizona decision?In the landmark case of Miranda v. Arizona, the Supreme Court found that the prosecution obtained evidence from the accused without them knowing about their right to an attorney.
As a result, the court ruled that upon arrest, a person is to be made aware of their rights under the 5th and 6th Amendment so that they would avoid incriminating themselves.
Find out more on Miranda v. Arizona at https://brainly.com/question/23818371
#SPJ1
When the state has salaried lawyers who work full time to represent indigent defendants, it is an example of:
Answer:
example of : public defenders
One example of ________ is the fact that a lawsuit filed by Washington against Nevada over river pollution goes directly before the Supreme Court. Group of answer choices granting a writ of certiorari original jurisdiction stare decisis appellate jurisdiction
One example of original jurisdiction is the fact that a lawsuit filed by Washington against Nevada over river pollution goes directly before the Supreme Court.
Original jurisdiction is the right of a court to hear a case for the primary time. it can be outstanding from appellate jurisdiction which is the right of a court to check a case that has already been heard and decided upon through a lower courtroom.
The term Original jurisdiction refers back to the query of which courtroom has the authority (“jurisdiction') to listen to a felony case for the primary time. as example, the family law court has the authority to pay attention to a baby's custody case, but now not to listen to a housebreaking case. therefore, the family regulation courtroom has original jurisdiction.
In common law prison structures, authentic jurisdiction of a court docket is the strength to pay attention to a case for the first time, as opposed to appellate jurisdiction, while a higher courtroom has the power to check a decreased court docket's choice.
Learn more about the original jurisdiction here: https://brainly.com/question/342388
#SPJ1
Title vii of the civil rights act applies to employers and labor unions with at least.
Title VII involves employers with 15 or more employees.
What is civil rights act?The Civil Rights Act of 1964 stands as a landmark civil rights and labor law in the United States that outlaws prejudice established on race, color, religion, sex, and national origin. The Civil Rights Act of 196( Pub. L. 86–449, 74 Stat. 89, legislated May 6, 1960) is a United States federal law that specified federal inspection of local voter registration polls and presented penalties for anyone who obstructed someone's endeavor to register to vote.
Title VII exists a provision of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 which restricts prejudice in virtually every employment circumstance founded on race, color, religion, gender, pregnancy, or national origin. In general, Title VII spreads to employers with 15 or more employees.
Both employment instruments and unions may be subject to Title VII'S prohibition even when they negotiate with uncovered employers. An employment agency exists protected by Title VII if it regularly provides employees to employers with 15 or more employees even if, in a distinct case, the employer has more infrequent than 15 employees.
To learn more about civil rights act refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/11079956
#SPJ4
The crime control model of the criminal justice system emphasizes the preservation of individual liberties, reliability, the adversarial process, and uses the courtroom and law as the decision point.
It is a true statement that the crime control model of the criminal justice system emphasizes the preservation of individual liberties, reliability, the adversarial process and uses the courtroom and law as the decision point.
What is the model of the criminal justice system?The model assumes that freedom is so important that every effort must be made to ensure that criminal justice decisions are based on reliable information.
Hence, the model of the criminal justice system emphasizes the adversarial process, the rights of defendants and formal decision-making procedures.
Therefore, It is a true statement that the crime control model of the criminal justice system emphasizes the preservation of individual liberties, reliability, the adversarial process and uses the courtroom and law as the decision point.
Read more about justice system
brainly.com/question/18445073
#SPJ1
requirements for the attack in private defence by means of examples
Answer:
To invoke the provisions of sec 100, I.P.C., four conditions must exist: # That the person exercising the right of private defense must be free from fault in bringing about the encounter. # There must be no safe or reasonable mode of escape by retreat; # There must have been a necessity for taking the life.
Explanation:
[tex]\huge{\tt{\color{cyan}{Answer}}}[/tex]
How do the attitudes of Brian and the Pena family toward the new law differ?
Brian thinks that the government’s new law is a good idea while the Pena family is wary of the new law.
How to illustrate the information?From the information, Brian thinks that the government’s new law is a good idea because it will reduce the pollution that has had a negative impact on his family. On the other hand, the Pena family is wary of the new law. It will be expensive for them to comply with it.
They worry that they will have to lower their other costs to meet the cost of compliance. They will either have to donate less to charities or lay off some of their employees.
Learn more about law on:
https://brainly.com/question/820417
#SPJ1
Complete question:
Brian and his family have lived next to a factory for more than 15 years. Brian works at the factory. Although he finds it convenient that his workplace is within walking distance, he’s worried about the negative effect of the pollution caused by the factory on his family. His children have developed asthma, and he and his wife consistently get respiratory illnesses every year. Last night, he saw on the news that the government has just passed a law that limits the amount of pollution every factory in his state can emit. Brian is hopeful now that his family’s health will begin to improve.
Situation 2
The Peña family has owned the local factory for generations. The Penas believe they are good corporate neighbors. They employ many people from the neighborhood, pay their taxes in full and on time, and donate to many charities. When they hear that the government has passed a law that requires companies to limit the amount of pollution they emit, the Penas get a little tense. They realize that it will cost them a huge amount of money to bring their factory into compliance. This expense will make the factory less profitable for them. To offset that loss of profit, they may have to donate less to the charities. They also worry they will not be able to employ as many people.
How do the attitudes of Brian and the Pena family toward the new law differ?
Which federal agency regulates the transportation of regulated product within the united states.
Answer:
Department of Transportation
What are the general requirements and major impacts of the gdpr, and how does this law differ from data protection legislation in the united states?.
Answer:
Some of the key privacy and data protection requirements of the GDPR include: Requiring the consent of subjects for data processing. Anonymizing collected data to protect privacy. Providing data breach notifications.
Explanation:
[tex]\huge{\tt{\color{cyan}{Answer}}}[/tex]
If someone runs a red light in front of you, and you choose NOT to slow down or steer away, you will
A. have to appear in court if there is collision
B. not oe at fault if there is a collision
C. probably not be involved in a collision
D. be partially at fault if there is a collision
When driving and someone runs a red light in front of you and you decide not to slow down or steer away, you will B. not be at fault if there is a collision.
What happens when someone runs a red light?If someone runs a red light, then they would have gone against traffic laws which could lead to an accident if they collide with someone that is coming from a side of the road with a green light.
If you are that person who was coming from the area with a green light and you collided with the person coming from the lane with a red light, you will not be at fault.
This is regardless of if you willfully did not turn away or slow down. You did not break the traffic law and so you cannot be not at fault because the person who ran the red light is the one who committed an offence.
In conclusion, option B is correct.
Find out more on running the red light at https://brainly.com/question/1266409
#SPJ1
Mia hawk works as a secretary at buildco. , a large construction company that specializes in government contracts. Mia is in charge of reviewing the invoices that buildco. Sends to the state of vermont, regarding the construction of a new facility for the state’s department of transportation. Mia discovers that buildco managers have been illegally overcharging the costs of time and materials in their invoices to state officials. Mia tells irene, a co-worker, about the overcharges during a lunch break and suggests that they should be fixed. Two weeks later, mia is abruptly fired by her immediate supervisor. Assuming that her termination was because of her disclosures to irene, did buildco. Legally terminate mia?.
Yes, Buildco. Legally remove mia because Mia did not report activity to the essential individuals or entities.
WhistleblowerA whistleblower is an individual, often an employee, who reveals data about activity within a private/public organization that is deemed illegal, corrupt, illicit, unsafe, or fraudulent. Whistleblowers can use a combination of internal or external channels to share information or allegations.
What is a whistleblower at work?A whistleblower is someone who declares workplace conditions that he or she believes to be unsafe or illegal. You can't avenge a whistleblower for documenting injuries, safety concerns, or other protected activities.
To learn more about whistleblowers visit the link
https://brainly.com/question/10649836
#SPJ4
True or false statement frequently civil disorder arises from an accumulation of grievances and then precipitating incident ignites rioting.