YES! Alice was being interrogated at the station. This is evident in paragraph 2, lines 3 to 8. ... Alice then asked Barker whether he could “get her a good deal” from the district attorney if she confessed her involvement in the crimes. YES! Alice was in custody. This is also evident in paragraph 1. ...Though he suspected that Alice had committed the burglaries, Detective Barker explained that she was free to leave the station at any time...
What are the answers to other questions?3. No, there was no mirinda warning! The officer was not required to give Alice the Miranda warnings. No evidence of such is found through out the text.
4a. No, Alice was not compelled to confess. Even when the officer knew she was involved in the burglaries, he gave her the the chance to speak at her will. This is evident as well in paragraph 1. ...Though he suspected that Alice had committed the burglaries, Detective Barker explained that she was free to leave the station at any time...
4b. Hence, her statements were made voluntarily. This is also found in paragraph 2. ...Barker responded by stating that the district attorney was responsible for making decisions regarding potential charges or plea bargains, but that Barker believed that “honesty is always the best policy.” Alice then proceeded to make incriminating statements regarding her participation in the burglaries.
Therefore, the correct answers are given above
learn more about mirinda warning: https://brainly.com/question/2242029
#SPJ1
Which of the following represents a benefit of the Second Amendment to citizens of the United States?
It allows citizens to organize into groups for peaceful protests.
It frees communities from crime.
It helps citizens provide a defense against foreign invaders.
It provides for every citizen to have a trial by jury.
Answer:
It is C. It helps citizens provide a defense against foreign invaders.
Explanation:
Answer: C: It helps citizens provide a defense against foreign invaders.
Explanation:
what is one example of the government limiting rights to protect the rights of others
Answer:
The government does not allow the media to publish false claims about public officials.
Explanation:
It's a serious business, journalism. A journalist is required to report the news impartially and objectively. Since people will believe what they read in the news, the reporter has a moral duty to convey the news objectively and without any coercion. He or she is unable to undermine their credibility. He must take care when determining if information concerning a public official is incorrect because of this. The fact that the government forbids the media from publishing false information on public officials is one instance of how the government restricts individual rights in order to preserve the rights of others. The reporter will get into problems if he makes assertions that he hasn't verified or doesn't have the evidence to back them up.
Managing office politics falls under the main HR manager responsibility of.....?
The correct option is D. Managing office politics falls under the main HR manager's responsibility of employee advocacy.
Office politics can be stopped from becoming toxic through human resources. In actuality, HR is ideally suited to promote a joyful and effective workplace. The impact of office politics should be kept to a minimum.
How does workplace politics occur in an organization?Office politics develops when staff members abuse their authority to attract unwarranted attention and popularity at work. Employees engage in office politics just to harm the reputation of a colleague in order to get advantages and win favor with their superiors.
The complicated social structure of a workplace is referred to as office politics. It involves employees pursuing their own objectives by abusing their positions of authority, influence, and delegation. Everyone has a unique job to play within the microcosm of any business.
Learn more about HR manager responsibility here:
https://brainly.com/question/25806768
#SPJ1
Answer:
B. Service
Explanation:
Hope this helps :)