It is a true statement that the crime control model of the criminal justice system emphasizes the preservation of individual liberties, reliability, the adversarial process and uses the courtroom and law as the decision point.
What is the model of the criminal justice system?The model assumes that freedom is so important that every effort must be made to ensure that criminal justice decisions are based on reliable information.
Hence, the model of the criminal justice system emphasizes the adversarial process, the rights of defendants and formal decision-making procedures.
Therefore, It is a true statement that the crime control model of the criminal justice system emphasizes the preservation of individual liberties, reliability, the adversarial process and uses the courtroom and law as the decision point.
Read more about justice system
brainly.com/question/18445073
#SPJ1
What area does the airport equipment use to go between gates and other areas of the airport?
The airport apron, apron, flight line, ramp, or tarmac is the area of an airport where aircraft are parked, unpacked or loaded, refueled, boarded, or defended.
What are the airport provinces called?Airports are separated into landside and airside zones. The landside is subject to fewer certain laws and is part of the public realm, while access to the airside zone is tightly controlled. Landside facilities may contain publicly accessible airport check-in desks, shops and ground transport facilities.
What is terminal location in airport?An airport terminal is a facility at an airport where passengers transfer between land transportation and the facilities that allow them to board and land from an aircraft.
To learn more about The airport apron, refer
https://brainly.com/question/11244275
#SPJ4
Sam entered into a contract with a travel agent for a holiday for himself, his wife and his children. The holiday was a total disappointment. The resort that the Jacksons had booked into was not available and the hotel they stayed in did not match the description given – it did not have the promised facilities, it was dirty and it had mildew and fungus growing on the walls. Sam’s wife was very angry and decided to sue the travel agent for refunds, although Sam was reluctant even though he entered into the contract with the travel agent on behalf of the family. What would be the court’s possible verdict on Sam’s wife claiming for refunds?
Answer:
20
Explanation:
why good to me I would have to be a lot of fun things to do u want to go to the bank and trust online banking login to the house and I don't want to know what is the best way to clean a lot of fun things to do in the morning and I can get you a new one of my favorites
Gautreaux v. Chicago housing authority was a class action suit that alleged that public housing was, in effect.
Gautreaux vs. Chicago Housing Authority class action lawsuit that alleged public housing was serving de facto govt. segregation. -gave $ to families to help buy homes in suburbs. as a result, happier, healthier, children had higher test scores.
About case :
The case began in 1966, when Dorothy Gautreaux and others filed a class action claiming that the Chicago Housing Authority (“CHA”) had intentionally perpetuated racial segregation both in its tenant assignment practices and in its siting policies. In 1969, the district court found for the plaintiff class, Gautreaux v. Chicago Housing Auth.,
Who is Dorothy Gautreaux?
Dorothy Gautreaux was a community and civil rights activist who lived in public housing on Chicago's South Side, and fought against their unjust policies. Under the guidance of ACLU lawyers, Gautreaux and 3 other residents sued the Chicago Housing Authority in the nation's first public housing desegregation lawsuit.
Learn more about Gautreaux vs. Chicago Housing Authority :
brainly.com/question/28161937
#SPJ4
Some oppose the “ticking time bomb" argument as a justification for torture because _____.
Answer: In the post 9/11 environment society has been consumed by the question of whether torture is acceptable under extreme circumstances. The “ticking bomb” metaphor was regularly employed by various figures in the US as an argument to justify the use of torture in interrogations during the term of the Bush Administration. It is an argument that has been used to justify torture in a set of very extreme and detailed circumstances. This paper will argue that the “ticking bomb” metaphor does not provide a convincing argument to justify the use of torture under extreme circumstances. First, definitions of torture and the “ticking bomb” metaphor will be provided. Second, this essay will discuss the use of torture by the US in the War on Terror. Third, the arguments for the use of torture under extreme circumstances, and the flaws of allowing torture under extreme circumstances will be addressed.
Explanation:
any act by which severe pain suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes as obtaining from him or a third person information or a confession, punishing him for an act he or a third person has committed or is suspected of having committed, or intimidating or coercing him or a third person, or for any reason based on discrimination of any kind, when such pain or suffering is inflicted by or at the instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official or other person acting in an official capacity (United Nations 1997).
Torture is prohibited in any circumstance under a variety of international laws, conventions, and norms. It is spelt out in not only the UN Convention against Torture, but also the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the law of armed conflicts, and the Geneva Conventions (Ip 2009: 36). The prohibition of torture is further enshrined in domestic laws of many of the countries who have ratified these treaties. However, the “ticking bomb” metaphor is used to justify torture in certain extreme situations. The concept of the “ticking bomb” was first conceptualised in a fiction novel written by Jean Larteguy in 1960 (Kovarovic 2010: 254). It describes a scenario whereby the torture of a suspect is considered necessary to obtain information to prevent a future catastrophic event from occurring (Kovarovic 2010: 254). The scenario is usually described as one where terrorists have planned an attack that is going to occur very soon and a large number of people will be killed unless the authorities obtain critical information from the source they have captured (Ip 2009: 40). It is essentially torture that has been sanctioned by the state in exceptional circumstances (Bufacchi and Arrigo 2006: 354). Torture is still considered to be wrong in these circumstances, but it is viewed as a necessary or lesser evil (Ip 2009: 40). Proponents of the “ticking bomb” scenario argue that “torture may be wrong…but mass murder is worse, so the lesser evil must be tolerated to prevent the greater one” (Roth 2005: 197).
Peter is married to gloria. elizabeth promises to pay peter r60 000 if he divorces gloria and marries her. peter agrees and elizabeth pays him the money. peter later refuses to divorce his wife and also refuses to return the money. advise elizabeth
If you are married and want a divorce, you must submit a petition for divorce to the district court. The same applies to the dissolution of your marriage after judicial separation.
Divorce law :
Deciding that your marriage has ended can be difficult. This guide is designed to give information about the law and procedure on divorce. When marriages break down there are often other issues that need to be resolved, such as child arrangements or financial matters. You may find it helpful to read Rights of Women’s other guides such as Children and the law: when parents separate and A guide to financial arrangements after marriage breakdown.
Change in divorce law:
Divorce laws changed on 6 April 2022. The law and procedure in this guide is for applications for divorce made on or after 6 April 2022. If you or your spouse applied for a divorce before 6 April 2022 then the previous laws and rules will apply.
Learn more about Divorce law :
brainly.com/question/26030510
#SPJ4
The net effect of the supreme court decisions in mcculloch v. Maryland and gibbons v. Ogden was.
The net effect of the supreme court decisions in McCulloch v. Maryland and Gibbons v. Ogden was establishing a strong precedent that unburdened future national policymaking from the restrictions of state prerogatives.
What is national policy?A comprehensive plan of action or set of guidelines adopted by the government on a national level to further national goals.Is a government document that outlines a comprehensive plan of action aimed at long-term sustainable country development.What do you mean by strong president?A compelling future vision for the nation.A capacity to view their own era in the context of history.Strong communication abilities.The guts to follow an unpopular path.Skills at handling crises.Integrity and virtue.Learn more about national policy here:
https://brainly.com/question/13608554
#SPJ4
What document explains your rights and responsibilities as a federal student loan.
Answer:
better you write your own answer.... make creative mind not searching mind
hope u understood
What is Islamic management?
Islamic Management can be defined as an emerging discipline which deals with the management of organizations from the area of the knowledge received from the revealed and other Islamic sources of knowledge. Results in applications compatible with the Islamic beliefs and practices.
Islamic management can also define as means conducting activities depending upon the guidance of Allah and following his Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him) with an accountable mentality, integrity and skills to achieve an objective.
Labeling laws require that ingredients in food products be listed on the container in descending order of their.
Which type of state court hears most criminal cases first and decides those
cases by a jury verdict?
A. Courts of last resort
B. Intermediate appellate courts
C. Federal courts
O D. Trial courts
Answer:
D. Trial Courts
C. Federal Courts
Answer:
D Trail courts and federal courts
Labeling laws require that ingredients in food products be listed on the container in descending order of their true or false?.
Labeling laws require that ingredients in food products be listed on the container in descending order of their weight ----- true
List of ingredients on food labels
All ingredients must be listed in descending order by weight, including added water.
The first ingredient listed is present in the largest amount by weight.The last ingredient listed is present in the least amount by weight.Importance of food labels:
As a food producer, you are legally required to appropriately label all your products. Failing to adhere to this can lead to severe consequences. If authorities deem you non compliant, the first step they’ll take is give you an improvement notice, which will detail what you are doing wrong, which rules you have broken, and the steps you must take to comply and by when.
You can continue production after you receive an improvement notice, but you must take all outlined steps to bring your business into compliance within the specified time frame. If you choose to ignore an improvement notice and are still non compliant after the specified date, you will be committing an offence and may face prosecution.
What are food labels?
Food labels carry useful information to help you make informed choices about what you and your family eat and drink. Most packaged foods are required to have a label with this information, but the information required depends on the food type.
The food label will tell you all sorts of information, including:
what the food ismanufacturer’s detailsnutrition informationingredientsweights and measures of productdate markingdirections for use and storagecountry of originallergens and additivesany nutrition and health claims.Some foods and drinks will have additional labeling requirements.
Some foods that are unlabeled (for example fresh fruit and vegetables or foods bought where they are made, such as bread at a bakery) may still be provided but could be on display with the food or provided if you ask for it.
Learn more about Food label law :
brainly.com/question/4114914
#SPJ4
A husband and wife were charged with stealing credit cards and charging expensive items on the misappropriated cards. An attorney was appointed by the court to represent the couple jointly. At the preliminary hearing, the judge found that the attorney would have no conflict representing both defendants in the joint trial. Halfway through the trial, however, a conflict arose between the defenses of the husband and wife. At the wife's request, the attorney moved that another attorney be appointed to represent the wife and that a mistrial be declared. The trial judge moved favorably on the attorney's motion. Another attorney was appointed to represent the wife, and as soon as the wife's trial began, her attorney moved to dismiss the case on the ground that jeopardy had attached during the wife's first trial and that she was being retried in violation of the United States Constitution.
Required:
Should the judge grant the wife's attorney's motion?
Answer: The Judge should not grant the wife's attorney's motion.
Explanation: In this case in the first trial the Judge awarded a mistrial due to a conflict in representation between the wife and the husband. This could have been a serious procedural error that could have resulted in an unfair trial for the wife and/or the husband. A mistrial adjourns the case without a decision and awards a new (fair) trial.
The net effect of the supreme court decisions in mcculloch v. Maryland and gibbons v. Ogden was.
Creating a powerful precedent that allowed future national policy to develop free of the constraints of state prerogatives.
What is national policy?In 1876, John A. Macdonald's Conservative Party introduced the National Policy, a Canadian economic agenda. Following the Conservatives' victory in the 1878 Canadian federal election, Macdonald began executing his agenda in 1879.
National policies are the main players in the government process, and they support rural economic development and growth. As a result, numerous types of NGOs and INGOs desire to implement in rural regions and enhance development operations.
Increase birth-age life expectancy from 67.5 to 70 by 2025. Total Fertility Rate (TFR) reduction to 2.1 at the national and sub-national levels by 2025. Reduce child mortality to 23 by 2025.
To know more about national policy follow the link:
https://brainly.com/question/1064937
#SPJ4
3. at 65 mph it will take you approximately a. 0 5 feet b. o 100 feet c. o 306 feet
At 65 mph it will take you approximately (b)100 feet.
FPM speed
At 65 mph, keeping one second of subsequent distance means the vehicle is traveling 100 feet behind the vehicle in front. It takes an car a minimum of 150 feet to stop. With a 100 foot gap plus the auto's stopping distance of 150 feet, an impact would happen within 250 feet. In general, establishing a minimum following distance of six seconds is necessary.
These are in ideal conditions. Add one more second for each hazard present, such as rain.
To learn more about feet per second visit the link-
https://brainly.com/question/22593069
#SPJ4
Why was it important for the Mauritanian government to adopt an adjustment strategy in the year 2000?
Answer:
A committee of military officers governed Mauritania from July 1978 to April 1992. A popular referendum approved the current constitution in July 1991.
The primary task of Mauritania’s successive governments has been to unify a community of diverse ethnic groups that are hierarchical in social structure and very strongly differentiated. The religion shared by all ethnic groups in the country has served as a centripetal force in creating a national culture.
Prime Minister is responsible to the National Assembly for the role of his various ministries as the government President is elected by absolute majority vote through a two-round system. Prime Minister is appointed by the president. Supreme Court is the most supreme amongst Mauritania courts.
Personalities have long exercised an important influence in the politics of Mauritania - the effective exercise of political power in the country depends on control over resources; perceived ability or integrity; and tribal, ethnic, family, and personal considerations.
Explanation:
Desmond and Beatrice have been friends for quite a long time. On 22nd June 2022, Desmond requested Beatrice accompany him to settle a matter between him and her friend, Princess. During the settlement, Beatrice did so well that Desmond promised her $250.00 within one week. Relying on this promise, Beatrice told her husband, Solomon, that she would buy him a pair of shoes at the end of the week. One week elapsed but Beatrice could not provide the shoes because Desmond failed to honor his promise. What area of law upon which the passage is based?
The fact that Desmond promised to pay Beatrice an extra amount and failed to deliver means that this passage is based on Breach of Contract.
What is Breach of Contract?A Breach of Contract occurs when a party breaks a promise that they made to another party. This means that they failed to uphold their side of a contract which then leads to the other party taking losses.
Desmond promised to give Beatrice $250 which means that he entered a unilateral contract. By not fulfilling that promise, he engaged in a breach of contract which Beatrice can take legal action for.
Find out more on unilateral contracts at https://brainly.com/question/15648341
#SPJ1
Which law requires schools to adopt and implement an internet safety policy to filter and secure online content and communication?.
Children's Internet Protection Act (CIPA) law mandates schools to adopt and execute an internet safety policy to filter and secure online content and contact.
What is Children's Internet Protection Act (CIPA)?The Children's Internet Protection Act (CIPA) was legislated by Congress in 2000 to address situations about children's access to obscene or destructive content over the Internet.
The Children's Internet Protection Act, understood as "CIPA," needs libraries that participate in specific federal programs to install "technology protection measures" on all of their Internet access terminals, nevertheless of whether federal programs are produced for the terminals or Internet connections. Both of Congress's earlier endeavors at restricting indecent Internet content, the Communications Decency Act and the Child Online Protection Act, were maintained to be unconstitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court on First Amendment grounds.
Hence, Children's Internet Protection Act (CIPA) law mandates schools to adopt and execute an internet safety policy to filter and secure online content and contact.
To learn more about Children's Internet Protection Act refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/14299588
#SPJ4
The schools are required to adopt and implement an internet safety policy to filter and secure online content and communication according to Children's Internet Protection Act.
What is the Children's Internet Protection Act?This act was enacted by Congress in 2000. This act looks at children's access to obscene content on the Internet.
It requires the school and other educational institutions to block the access of the children to obscene content on the internet.
Thus, Children's Internet Protection Act is the law of 2000, which makes the schools adopt and implement an internet safety policy to filter and secure online content and communication.
To learn more, refer to: brainly.com/question/14299588
#SPJ4
What does privatization mean in government?
Answer:
privatization, transfer of government services or assets to the private sector. State-owned assets may be sold to private owners, or statutory restrictions on competition between privately and publicly owned enterprises may be lifted. Services formerly provided by government may be contracted out.
The work of a group that regulates relations between various criminal enterprises involved in the smuggling and sale of drugs, prostitution, gambling, and other illegal activities is called.
The work of a group that regulates relations between various criminal enterprises involved in the smuggling and sale of drugs, prostitution, gambling, and other illegal activities is called Organized
Crime.
What is OrganizedCrime?Organized crime refers to global, national, or local groups of highly centralised criminal businesses that engage in illicit conduct, most typically for profit.
Members of organised criminal groups enjoy a sense of prestige, power, and protection in addition to money. Groups, like legal enterprises, have a pyramid power structure.
The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), enacted in 1970, is a federal statute aimed at combating organised crime in the United States. It allows for civil and criminal consequences for racketeering activities carried out as part of a continuing criminal enterprise.
To know more about OrganizedCrime follow the link:
https://brainly.com/question/10571360
#SPJ4
What document explains your rights and responsibilities as a federal student loan.
Master Promissory Note describes your rights and responsibilities as a federal student loan.
What is Master Promissory Note?
The MPN can be utilized to create one or more loans for one or more academic years (for up to 10 years). It documents the terms and conditions under which you decide to refund the loan in full and will explain your rights and obligations as a borrower.
The Master Promissory Note summarizes what you owe, how interest exists calculated when interest stands charged, available repayment plans, late fees, collection expenses, and deferment and cancellation options.
Some key components of promissory notes stand as follows,
It must be in writing.It must include an unconditional promise to pay.The sum payable must be specific.The promissory notes must be inscribed by the maker.It must be payable to a certain individual.It should be appropriately stamped.Hence, Master Promissory Note describes your rights and responsibilities as a federal student loan.
To learn more about Master Promissory Note refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/28168666
#SPJ4
what US Supreme Court case decided that the death penalty itself did NOT violate the Constitution?
Answer: Gregg v. Georgia
Explanation:
When one observes spalling in a fire, the following conclusion can be drawn
When one observes spalling in a fire, the following conclusion can be drawn:
the destruction was a result of heata v shaped pattern is observedWhat is a Fire?The term refers to a condition whereby a substances combine with the oxygen present in their environment to form or produce light, flame heat, smoke, or combustion.
Most time, the fire produced can cause a severe damage to people or property even although it may be useful for other beneficial purposes too.
The cause of a spalling in fire is when there is an extremely hot temperature while the burning materials develop or produce radiant heat during a certain level.
Therefore, the Option B & C is correct.
Missing options the fire was deliberate, the destruction was a result of heat, a v shaped pattern is observed, the fire was low burning, the fire became oxygen starved during the fire
Read more about Fire
brainly.com/question/26386412
#SPJ1
Why is it important for the person with power of attorney to be a strong communicator?
A) it helps them understand end-of-life law better.
B) it helps them make sure their own wishes are carried out.
C) it helps them make a strong case for the patient.
D) it helps them prove they are qualified for the role.
Answer:
It helps them make a strong case for the patient
Explanation:
When delivering a case, attorneys and lawyers need to make sure they provide their case clearly and effectively to ensure nothing is overlooked while providing strong backing.
9. Susan was a patient at Rasmussen Hospital on September 5. John, Susan’s husband, has requested Susan’s inpatient clinical information and signs an authorization. You are the Release of information clerk at Rasmussen Hospital. Will you honor John’s request and provide him with Susan’s clinical information
Within the law, you are permitted to release the record to the husband, hence you should go ahead a give this information to the husband.
See the explanation below
The law behind the release of medical information.According to the HIPAA Privacy Rule at 45 CFR 164.510(b)
"specifically permits covered entities to share information that is directly relevant to the involvement of a spouse".
However, as a professional, you are not supposed to release information of a patient to an unknown person, in such a case the patient must approve of this first before you go ahead to give it out.
Learn more about the HIPAA Privacy Rule here:
https://brainly.com/question/11069745
#SPJ1
do you think the action of taking the property is fair? Why or why not?
Depending on the purpose, the action of taking property by a government is fair, in that the government can legally take land privately for public purposes, provided that this taking of property is properly compensated to the owner of the property.
What is the right to property?It is the 17th article of the Constitution, which stipulates that every citizen has the right to property, which must not be arbitrarily withdrawn or deprived of it.
The taking of government property is generally carried out for public purposes, being intended for the benefit of society, such as for transformation into schools and hospitals for example.
Therefore, the action of taking a property is fair and constitutional, but the owner of the property must be financially rewarded so that it is
Find out more about right to property here:
https://brainly.com/question/22370263
#SPJ1
Suppose you have a collision involving another car with a single occupant, the driver. It is your fault. No one is seriously hurt, but the other driver chooses to go to the emergency room to be checked out. The medical cost is $1,500. The damage to your car is $3,000, And the damage to the other car is $6,000. You have the following minimum coverage:
Bodily injury liability coverage: $15,000 per person, $30,000 per accident
Property damage liability coverage: $5,000
No collision.
1. How much would your insurance pay and how much would you pay? Explain why.
The total costs would be:1500+3000+6000+15000+30000= $55 500 now it depends on how much the insurance is. There is no average settlement on the above case.
What is an insurance?Insurance is a means of protection from financial loss in which, in exchange for a fee, a party agrees to compensate another party in the event of a certain loss, damage, or injury. It is a form of risk management, primarily used to hedge against the risk of a contingent or uncertain loss.
An entity which provides insurance is known as an insurer, insurance company, insurance carrier, or underwriter. A person or entity who buys insurance is known as a policyholder, while a person or entity covered under the policy is called an insured.
The insurance transaction involves the policyholder assuming a guaranteed, known, and relatively small loss in the form of a payment to the insurer in exchange for the insurer's promise to compensate the insured in the event of a covered loss.
Learn more about insurance, here:
https://brainly.com/question/27822778
#SPJ2
What are some of the penalties for violating fraud, waste, and abuse (FWA) laws?
Answer: civil penalty not less than $5,500 and not more than $11,000 plus three times the amount of actual damage to the government resulting from any violation of the FCA. If convicted, the individual shall be fined, imprisoned, or both. If the violations resulted in death, the individual may be imprisoned for any
term of years or for life, or both.
do you think the action of taking the property is fair?
It is no please that I have not been seen
An accelerant is
alaways used to start a fire
always a low volatility chemical
must contain nitrogen in the chemical composition
must be an endothermic burning compound
typically a high volatility liquid
Accelerators are always used to start a fire.
The startup accelerator, also known as the seed accelerator, is a time-limited, cohort-based program that includes mentoring and education elements and culminates in public pitch events and demo days.
In fire protection, a fire accelerator is any substance or mixture that accelerates or speeds up the initiation and escalation of fire. accelerators are often used in arson, and some accelerants can cause explosions.
The accelerator is a substance used to spread fire rapidly.
Large charred or "crocodile" blisters indicate that the fire progressed rapidly and generated high temperatures, indicating that liquid fire accelerators may have been used.
Learn more about accelerator here https://brainly.com/question/27962285
#SPJ1
You are approaching an intersection and are preparing to turn right with a green light. You should slow down, signal your turn and
Answer: look both sides before taking the turn
Explanation: