In this triangle what is the value of x

The solution to the system of linear equations is (x, y, z) = (64/11, 37/11, 9/11). The system has exactly one solution.

Let's solve the system of linear equations correctly.

The given system of linear equations is:

x = y + 3z = 6

x - 2y = 5

2x - 2y + 5z = 9

To determine the number of solutions, we can analyze the system using the method of elimination or substitution. Let's use the method of elimination:

From equation 1, we have:

x = y + 3z

Substituting this value of x in equation 2:

(y + 3z) - 2y = 5

y + 3z - 2y = 5

-z + 3z = 5 - y

2z = 5 - y

Now, let's substitute the value of x in equation 3:

2(y + 3z) - 2y + 5z = 9

2y + 6z - 2y + 5z = 9

11z = 9

Simplifying the equation, we find:

z = 9/11

Now, substituting this value of z back into the equation 2z = 5 - y, we get:

2(9/11) = 5 - y

18/11 = 5 - y

18/11 - 5 = -y

18/11 - 55/11 = -y

-37/11 = -y

y = 37/11

Finally, we can substitute the values of y and z into equation 1 to find the value of x:

x = y + 3z

x = 37/11 + 3(9/11)

x = 37/11 + 27/11

x = 64/11

Therefore, the solution to the system of linear equations is (x, y, z) = (64/11, 37/11, 9/11).

The system has exactly one solution.

for such more question on linear equations

https://brainly.com/question/19803308

#SPJ8

The option that is not true about polynomial functions is:

Option D. The deg (f ^ 3) = 3m​

For polynomial functions f(x) and g(x), if deg(f) = m * deg(g) = n, then we have the following:

Option A: deg(f + g) = max(m, n)

This is true because we know that the degree of the sum of two polynomials is the maximum of their individual degrees.

Option B: deg(f * g) <= m + n

This is true because we know that the degree of the product of two polynomials is at most the sum of their individual degrees.

Option C: If g is a factor of f, then deg(f) <= m

This is true because If g is a factor of f, it means that f can be divided by g without leaving a remainder. In this case, the degree of f is less than or equal to the degree of g.

D. The deg(f ^ 3) = 3m

This is not true because the degree of the polynomial f raised to the power of 3 is not necessarily equal to 3 times the degree of f. The degree of f^3 will depend on the individual terms and their exponents.

Read more about Degree of Polynomials at: https://brainly.com/question/1600696

#SPJ1

Based on your description, it appears that you have a rectangle-shaped field with a circular pond located inside it.

The pond has different measurements at different positions:

A small circle on top measuring 2 cm, a larger circle in the middle measuring 7 cm, and an even larger circle on the right measuring 12.5 cm.

The rectangular field likely surrounds the circular pond, and the dimensions you provided describe the diameters or radii of the circles within it.

The sizes of the circles may indicate different areas or depths of the pond in those respective positions.

If you require any additional information or have any specific questions about this arrangement, please let me know, and I'll be happy to assist you further.

A little circle at the top of the pond measures 2 cm in diameter, a larger circle in the middle is 7 cm, and an even larger circle on the right measures 12.5 cm.

The dimensions you provide describe the diameters or radii of the circles within the circular pond, which is most likely surrounded by the rectangular field.

Different locations or pond depths may be indicated by the sizes of the circles in each location.

Please let me know if you need any more details or if you have any particular questions concerning this agreement, and I'll be pleased to help.

For similar questions on rectangle-shaped

https://brainly.com/question/23378174

#SPJ8

The time taken for 1414 people to paint 14 walls is 6,430.44 minutes.

To find out how many minutes it would take 1414 people to paint 14 walls, we can use the information given to find the ratio.

We know that it takes 9 people 41 minutes to paint 9 walls.

Let's find the ratio:

(9 people) : (1414 people) = (41 minutes) : (x minutes)

Use the mutual multiplication property of the resulting ratio:

9 * x = 1414 * 41

Right simplification:

9x = 57974

To solve this problem, create a ratio using the information provided:

(9 people) : (1414 people) = (41 minutes) : (x minutes)

We can multiply the ratios:

9 * x = 1414 * 41

On the right side of the equation, calculate the product of 1414 and 41, which equals 57974.

4 444 So:

444 9x = 57974 To separate

4 share both sides of the equation with 9:

4 x = 57974/9

share both sides with 9:

4 x = 6430.44

It will take 6,430.44 minutes for 1,414 people to paint 14 walls.

For more questions on time taken:

https://brainly.com/question/16963199

#SPJ8

Using the Venn diagram, each set and the number of elements in each set are:

a. U = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12}

b. A = {1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8}

c. B = {4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 11}

d. C = {6, 8, 9, 12}

e. A ∪ B = {1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11}

f. A ∩ B = {4, 5, 6}

A Venn diagram is a pictorial representation used to visualize the relationships between different sets of objects or concepts.

a.) U is the universal set. This implies it contains all the elements in the set. Thus:

U = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12}

b.) A is all element (number) is set A (circle A). Thus:

A = {1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8}

c.) B is all element is set B (circle B). Thus:

B = {4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 11}

d.) C is all element is set C (circle C). Thus:

C = {6, 8, 9, 12}

e.) A ∪ B is all element is sets A and B (circles A and B). Thus:

A ∪ B = {1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11}

f.) A ∩ B is all element is sets A and B (circles A and B) have in common. Thus:

A ∩ B = {4, 5, 6}

Learn more about sets on:

brainly.com/question/21850160

#SPJ1

Answer:

Kirsten makes $12.50 per hour

Step-by-step explanation:

The total is $432.50

$5 is taken out of her paycheck, so that will be negative.

35 hours is the time she spent working.

The unknown variable we are looking for is the amount she makes in one hour.

Setting up the equation, we get:

$432.50 = $35x - $5

where x is the amount she makes every hour

Solve for x:

$437.50=$35x

$437.50 / $35 = x

Therefore, x = $12.50

The value of dy/dt  at x= 1 if y = [tex]3x^2[/tex] - 3 and dx/dt = 3 is 18.

To find dy/dt at x = 1, we need to differentiate the given equation y = [tex]3x^2[/tex] - 3 with respect to t and then substitute x = 1 and dx/dt = 3.

Let's begin by differentiating y = [tex]3x^2[/tex]- 3 with respect to t using the chain rule. Since y is a function of x and x is a function of t, we have:

dy/dt = (dy/dx) * (dx/dt)

Given dx/dt = 3, we can rewrite the equation as:

dy/dt = [tex](dy/dx) * 3[/tex]

Now, let's find the derivative of y = [tex]3x^2 - 3[/tex] with respect to x:

dy/dx = d/dx[tex](3x^2 - 3)[/tex]

= 6x

Substituting this back into the equation for dy/dt, we get:

dy/dt = [tex](6x) * 3[/tex]

= 18x

Finally, we can evaluate dy/dt at x = 1:

dy/dt at x = 1 = 18(1)

= 18

Therefore, the value of dy/dt at x = 1 is 18.

It's important to note that the value of dx/dt = 3 was given, and we used it to find dy/dt using the chain rule and the derivative of the equation with respect to x.


Know more about the chain rule here:
https://brainly.com/question/30895266


#SPJ8

Answer:

x = - 1

Step-by-step explanation:

P = [tex]\frac{x-2}{x+1}[/tex]

the denominator of the rational function cannot be zero as this would make it undefined. Equating the denominator to zero and solving gives the value that x cannot be.

x + 1 = 0 ( subtract 1 from both sides )

x = - 1

P is undefined when x = - 1

The domain of the function y = 3 tan(2/3x) is all real numbers except for x = (3n + ³/₂)π., where n is an integer.

The function is given as: y = 3 tan(2/3x)

The function above is defined for all values of x except where the tangent function is undefined. The tangent function is undefined at angles where the cosine is zero. In this case, the cosine is zero when 2/3x is equal to an odd multiple of π/2.

So we set (2/3)x equal to (2n + 1)π/2, where n is an integer:

(2/3)x = (2n + 1)π/2.

To solve for x, we multiply both sides by 3/2:

x = (3/2)(2n + 1)π/2.

x = (3n + ³/₂)π.

Therefore, the function is undefined when x is equal to (3n + 3/2)π, where n is an integer.

The domain of the function y = 3 tan(2/3x) is all real numbers except for x = (3n + ³/₂)π., where n is an integer.

Read more about https://brainly.com/question/10197594at:

#SPJ1

Answer:

  (b)  x + 6

Step-by-step explanation:

You want the rule for the x-coordinate when the transformation is a right shift of 6 units.

A point that is the image of a pre-image point with x-coordinate x will be 6 units farther right of the y-axis than the pre-image point.

The x-coordinate measures how far right of the y-axis a point is. When that distance increases by 6 units, the x-coordinate increases by 6 units:

  x ⇒ x+6 . . . . . . the x-coordinate transformation rule

<95141404393>

The manufacturing cycle efficiency (MCE) of Navems for its elevators is 38.6%

The correct answer choice is option A.

Manufacturing cycle efficiency (MCE) = Value-added production time / Total cycle time.

Value-added production time;

Inspection time = 12 days

Process time = 5 days

Total = 17 days

Total cycle time:

Wait time = 12 days

Inspection time = 12 days

Process time = 5 days

Move time = 6 days

Queue time = 9 days

= 44 days

Hence,

Manufacturing cycle efficiency (MCE) = Value-added production time / Total cycle time × 100

= 17 days / 44 days × 100

= 38.63636363636363

Approximately,

38.6%

Read more on manufacturing cycle efficiency:

https://brainly.com/question/14261998

#SPJ1

Answer:

To determine the first term of the geometric progression, let's assume it is 'a'. From the given information, we know that:

Second Term = a + 50

(n + 1)th Term = a + 56

We also have the formula for the nth term of a geometric sequence:

nth term = a * r^(n-1)

where 'r' is the common ratio between consecutive terms. Since the difference between consecutive terms remains constant, i.e., 50 for the second term and 56 for the (n + 1)th term, we can set up the equation:

a + 50 = a * r^1

a + 56 = a * r^2

Solve the equations simultaneously:

a + 50 = a * r^1 => a - 50/r = 0

a + 56 = a * r^2 => a - 56/r = 0

Adding the two equations, we get:

2a - (50/r + 56/r) = 0

2a - (50 + 56)/r = 0

Simplifying the equation further, we obtain:

2a - (106/r) = 0

Now, solve for 'a':

2a - (106/r) = 0

2a = (106/r)

=> 2a = 106/r

The value of 'a' depends on the value of 'r', so we cannot determine its exact value without knowing 'r'. However, once we know 'r', we can calculate the value of 'a'.

To create a box from a flat piece of metal, you typically cut equal-sized squares from each corner, then fold up the sides. This effectively reduces the size of the base of the final box by twice the length of the side of the squares.

The original size of the piece of tin is 40 cm x 70 cm. Let's represent the length of the side of the squares cut from the corners as x (in cm). After the squares are removed, the size of the base of the box will be (40 - 2x) cm by (70 - 2x) cm.

The problem states that the base area of the box is 1984 cm^2. Thus, we can set up the following equation:

(40 - 2x) * (70 - 2x) = 1984.

Expanding this equation gives:

2800 - 140x - 80x + 4x^2 = 1984,

4x^2 - 220x + 2800 = 1984,

4x^2 - 220x + 816 = 0.

Dividing through by 4 gives:

x^2 - 55x + 204 = 0.

This quadratic equation can be solved using the quadratic formula, x = [ -b ± sqrt(b^2 - 4ac) ] / 2a. Here, a = 1, b = -55, and c = 204.

The discriminant, b^2 - 4ac = (-55)^2 - 4*1*204 = 3025 - 816 = 2209.

The square root of 2209 is 47.

Therefore, the solutions for x are:

x = [55 ± 47] / 2

x = 51, 4.

Since the length of the sides of the squares (x) must be less than half the length of the shorter side of the original tin piece (which is 40 cm / 2 = 20 cm), the valid solution is x = 4 cm. Thus, each square cut from the corners is 4 cm on a side.

Therefore, for a double batch of 2,000 lbs of flour in mixer 1, you would need 8,000 lbs of water.

To determine the amount of water needed for a double batch of 2,000 pounds (lbs) of flour in mixer 1, we need to consider the ratio of water to flour.

Typically, when making a batch, there is a specific ratio of water to flour. Let's assume the ratio is 1:2, meaning for every 1 pound of flour, we need 2 pounds of water.

For a double batch, we need to multiply the amount of flour by 2:

2,000 lbs of flour × 2 = 4,000 lbs of flour.

Using the ratio, we multiply the amount of flour by the ratio:

4,000 lbs of flour × 2 lbs of water per 1 lb of flour = 8,000 lbs of water.

For such more question on multiply

https://brainly.com/question/29793687

#SPJ8

The equation of the linear relationship in slope-intercept form is y = 2x - 8. Option A is the correct answer.

To determine the equation of the linear relationship in slope-intercept form based on the table, we need to find the slope and y-intercept.

By observing the table, we can calculate the slope by selecting any two points. Let's choose the points (0, -8) and (4, 0).

Slope (m) = (change in y) / (change in x)

= (0 - (-8)) / (4 - 0)

= 8 / 4

= 2

Now that we have the slope, we can find the y-intercept by substituting the values of one point and the slope into the equation y = mx + b and solving for b.

Using the point (0, -8):

-8 = 2(0) + b

b = -8

Therefore, the equation of the linear relationship in slope-intercept form is: y = 2x - 8. Option A is the correct answer.

For such more question on equation:

https://brainly.com/question/17145398

#SPJ8

To simplify the expression (2x-3)(5x^2-2x+7), we can use the distributive property.

First, multiply 2x by each term inside the second parentheses:

2x * 5x^2 = 10x^3

2x * -2x = -4x^2

2x * 7 = 14x

Next, multiply -3 by each term inside the second parentheses:

-3 * 5x^2 = -15x^2

-3 * -2x = 6x

-3 * 7 = -21

Combine all the resulting terms:

10x^3 - 4x^2 + 14x - 15x^2 + 6x - 21

Now, combine like terms:

10x^3 - 19x^2 + 20x - 21

So, the simplified expression is 10x^3 - 19x^2 + 20x - 21.

For such more question on parentheses

https://brainly.com/question/172904

#SPJ8

Si un hombre camina a una velocidad promedio de 4 2/5 km por hora, podemos calcular la distancia que puede recorrer en 2 2/3 horas.

Primero, convertimos la velocidad promedio a una fracción impropia. 4 2/5 se puede expresar como 22/5. Por lo tanto, la velocidad es de 22/5 km por hora.

Luego, multiplicamos la velocidad por el tiempo para obtener la distancia. En este caso, la multiplicación sería (22/5) * (8/3) = 176/15 km.

Entoncs, el hombre puede llegar a una distancia de 176/15 km en 2 2/3 horas.

En resumen, el resultado es 176/15 km.

For such more question on velocidad

https://brainly.com/question/31769387

#SPJ8

Answer:

1) no special type; B

2) see below

Step-by-step explanation:

Additive inverse of the matrix is the negative of that number:

[ -7 6 -4]-> [7 -6 4]

[-3 4 -2] -> [ 3 -4 2]

Answer:

x≥2 and x<2 : ∅

x≥2 or x<2 : All real numbers

x≤2 and x≥2 : 2

Step-by-step explanation:

the first one must follow both conditions, so no number would work.

the second one works with any number, so all real numbers.

the third one has only one condition that works, 2

Answer:

(x-2)^2 + (y+3)^2 = 5.1^2

Step-by-step explanation:

The equation of a circle is (x-h)^2 + (y-k)^2 = r^2, where h and k are the x and y values of the center of the circle respectively and r stands for the radius.

The center is given to us, at (2, -3) so we can plug that in:

(x-(2))^2 + (y- (-3))^2 = r^2

Simplify:

(x-2)^2 + (y+3)^2 = r^2

We can also solve for the radius by getting another point given to us: (3,2).

Using the pythagorean theorem, we can find how far the two points are away from each other:

a^2 + b^2 = c^2

1^2 + 5^2 = c^2
1 + 25 = c^2

26 = c^2

c ~ 5.1

Plug the radius we solved for in for r:
(x-2)^2 + (y+3)^2 = 5.1^2

The given passage provides a proof that the Separation Axioms follow from the Replacement Schema.

The proof involves introducing a set F and showing that {a: e X : O(x)} is equal to F (X) for every X. Therefore, the conclusion is that the Separation Axioms can be derived from the Replacement Schema.In the given passage, the author presents a proof that demonstrates a relationship between the Separation Axioms and the Replacement Schema.

The proof involves the introduction of a set F and establishes that the set {a: e X : O(x)} is equivalent to F (X) for any given set X. This implies that the conditions of the Separation Axioms can be satisfied by applying the Replacement Schema. Essentially, the author is showing that the Replacement Schema can be used to derive or prove the Separation Axioms. By providing this proof, the passage establishes a connection between these two concepts in set theory.

Learn more about axioms here:

https://brainly.com/question/2857184

#SPJ8

The angles formed by the transversal line r and the parallel lines s and t, have that:

A. ∠5 ≈ ∠7 {vertical angles}

B. ∠1 + ∠2 = 180° {angles on straight line}

C. ∠4 ≈ ∠8 {corresponding angles}

D. ∠6 + ∠7 = 180° {angles on straight line}

When a transversal line intersects a pair of parallel lines, several angles are formed which includes: Corresponding angles, vertical angles, and alternate angles.

A. The angles ∠5 and ∠7 are vertical angles as they are vertically opposite, so ∠5 = ∠7

B. The angles ∠1 and ∠2 angles on a straight line and their sum is equal to 180° so;

∠1 + ∠2 = 180°

C. The angles ∠4 and ∠8 are corresponding angles and are equal, so ∠4 = ∠8

D. The angles ∠6 and ∠7 angles on a straight line and their sum is equal to 180° so;

∠6 + ∠7 = 180°

Therefore, for the angles formed by the transversal line r and the parallel lines s and t, we have that:

A. ∠5 ≈ ∠7 {vertical angles}

B. ∠1 + ∠2 = 180° {angles on straight line}

C. ∠4 ≈ ∠8 {corresponding angles}

D. ∠6 + ∠7 = 180° {angles on straight line}

Read more about angles here:https://brainly.com/question/24607467

#SPJ1

These lines are not sufficient for me to evaluate their content and determine their truthfulness or accuracy.

In order to provide a meaningful response, I would need you to provide the specific lines or statements you would like me to evaluate.

However, I can assure you that as an AI language model, I generate responses based on the data I have been trained on up until September 2021. I do not have real-time information or access to the internet to verify the accuracy of specific statements made after that time.

I generate responses based on patterns and information from the training data, but I do not copy content from specific sources without attribution.

However, if you copy and paste any responses I provide without proper attribution, that would be considered plagiarism.

It is always important to provide proper citations and references when using information from any source, including AI-generated content.

For more such questions on truthfulness

https://brainly.com/question/3755887

#SPJ8

The forecasted level of output for the 15th year would be 14/15000.

To forecast the level of output for the 15th year, we need to analyze the given information about the firm's total production of cars at the end of ten years of operation and its production during the first year.

According to the information provided, the firm's total production of cars at the end of ten years of operation is 14/1500. However, the production of logo cars during the first year is not specified. We need this information to accurately forecast the level of output for the 15th year.

If we assume that the production of logo cars during the first year is constant throughout the ten-year period, we can use the given information to estimate the average annual production. Since we have 14/1500 as the total production over ten years, we can calculate the average annual production as (14/1500) / 10.

(14/1500) / 10 = 14/15000

Therefore, the estimated average annual production is 14/15000.

Now, to forecast the level of output for the 15th year, we can assume that the average annual production remains constant. Therefore, the forecasted production for the 15th year would be the same as the average annual production.

Hence, the forecasted level of output for the 15th year would be 14/15000.

for such more question on total production

https://brainly.com/question/25109150

#SPJ8

The interval to the solution is (a) the interval from -7 to 6

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

log(x + 9) + log(x - 9) = 0.47712

Apply the rule of logarithm

So, we have

log(x² - 9) = 0.47712

Take the exponent of both sides

x² - 9 = [tex]10^{0.47712[/tex]

So, we have

x² = 9 + [tex]10^{0.47712[/tex]

Evaluate

x² ≈ 12

Take the square root of both sides

x ≈ ±3.46

This value is between the interval -7 to 6

Read more about equations at

https://brainly.com/question/2972832

#SPJ1

The algebric expression -1/4 + 3/5 is equal to 7/20 when simplified.

To solve the expression -1/4 + 3/5, we need to find a common denominator for the fractions and then perform the addition.

The common denominator for 4 and 5 is 20. We can rewrite the fractions with this denominator:

-1/4 = -5/20

3/5 = 12/20

Now that the fractions have the same denominator, we can add them:

-5/20 + 12/20 = (-5 + 12)/20 = 7/20

Therefore, -1/4 + 3/5 is equal to 7/20.

To further simplify the fraction, we can check if there is a common factor between the numerator and denominator. In this case, 7 and 20 have no common factors other than 1, so the fraction is already in its simplest form.

Thus, the final answer is 7/20.

For more such question on algebric expression. visit :

https://brainly.com/question/4344214

#SPJ8

To simplify the expression 14√27 - √3, we can simplify the radicals and then perform the subtraction:

First, let's simplify the radicals:

√27 = √(9 × 3) = √9 × √3 = 3√3

Now we can rewrite the expression:

14√27 - √3 = 14(3√3) - √3

Next, distribute the 14:

14(3√3) - √3 = 42√3 - √3

Finally, combine like terms:

42√3 - √3 = 41√3

So the simplified expression is 41√3.

The left-hand side of the equation represents the logarithm of 64 with base x, and it is not possible to find a real value of x that satisfies the equation.

solve the equation logₓ(64) + 5 = 2, we can follow these steps:

Step 1: Move the constant term to the other side of the equation:

logₓ(64) = 2 - 5

logₓ(64) = -3

Step 2: Rewrite the equation in exponential form:

x^(-3) = 64

Step 3: Rewrite 64 as a power of x:

x^(-3) = x^6

Step 4: Set the exponents equal to each other:

-3 = 6

The equation -3 = 6 is not true, which means there is no real solution to the given equation.

Therefore, the equation logₓ(64) + 5 = 2 has no solution in the real number system.

For more such questions on logarithm

https://brainly.com/question/30128287

#SPJ8

a. The vertical shift of the graph of G(x) compared to the graph of F(x) is an upward shift of 1 unit.

b. The vertical shift of the graph of G(x) compared to the graph of F(x) is an upward shift of 1 unit, while there is no horizontal shift between the two graphs.

In the functions G(x) = 2^(-x) and F(x) = 2^x:

Vertical Shift:

The vertical shift refers to the movement of a graph up or down along the y-axis. In this case, comparing G(x) = 2^(-x) to F(x) = 2^x, there is a vertical shift present.

The graph of F(x) = 2^x has its vertex (the lowest point of the graph) at the point (0, 1) on the coordinate plane.

The graph of G(x) = 2^(-x) is obtained by reflecting the graph of F(x) about the x-axis. This reflection results in a vertical shift of the graph. The graph of G(x) will have its vertex (the highest point of the graph) at the point (0, 1).

Therefore, the vertical shift of the graph of G(x) compared to the graph of F(x) is an upward shift of 1 unit.

Horizontal Shift:

The horizontal shift refers to the movement of a graph left or right along the x-axis. In this case, comparing G(x) = 2^(-x) to F(x) = 2^x, there is no horizontal shift present.

Both G(x) = 2^(-x) and F(x) = 2^x have their graphs centered at the y-axis, passing through the point (0, 1). Therefore, there is no horizontal shift between the two functions.

To summarize, the vertical shift of the graph of G(x) compared to the graph of F(x) is an upward shift of 1 unit, while there is no horizontal shift between the two graphs.

For such more question on horizontal:

https://brainly.com/question/25081736

#SPJ8

The following question may be like this:

Consider the functions G(x) = 2^(-x) and F(x) = 2^x.

State the vertical shift of the graph of G(x) compared to the graph of F(x).

State the horizontal shift of the graph of G(x) compared to the graph of F(x). explain

The number the spinner is most likely to land on is 2

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

The spinner

From the spinner, we have the number that covers the largest area to be 2

i.e.

Largest area = 2

This means that the number it is most likely to land on is 2 and it has the highest probability

Read more about probability at

https://brainly.com/question/31649379

#SPJ1