Abolitionists in the North responded differently to Southern abolitionists. The Southern abolitionists who opposed slavery and the conditions of the slaves, mostly white, stood on a minority ground in the South, and it made their advocacy very difficult. Most of the Southern abolitionists who lived in the Southern states, by nature, would avoid confrontation.
They faced extreme pressure from slavery advocates, and most of them held low positions in society and were considered radicals and outsiders. In contrast, the abolitionists in the North had more substantial numbers and were more influential. The Northerners saw themselves as civilized, and they supported and promoted progress. The issue of slavery to them was a crucial test for democracy. They believed that slavery was a violation of human rights, and their beliefs fueled their movement. Abolitionists, both black and white, worked together and gathered support for their cause through petitions, conferences, publications, and speeches. The Southern abolitionists had a hard time reaching the general public and getting their message across.
They had to be careful about what they said, as some were aware that the issue of slavery would divide the South and could even lead to violence. The Southern abolitionists were isolated, and it was challenging for them to build a network of support that could help them accomplish their goals. The majority of the white Southerners believed that slaves were property, and any attempt to challenge this belief was seen as a threat to their way of life.
Northern abolitionists viewed Southern abolitionists with suspicion, as some Northerners considered them to be traitors to their homeland. It was believed that Southern abolitionists were not doing enough to challenge slavery. However, some Northerners recognized the significant challenges faced by the Southern abolitionists and supported their efforts.
In conclusion, the Southern abolitionists faced a unique set of challenges, making it more difficult for them to advocate for the end of slavery. Northern abolitionists, on the other hand, had a more significant number of supporters and resources, which made it easier for them to gain the momentum required to end slavery. Despite the differences, both Northern and Southern abolitionists were united in their goal of abolishing slavery in America.
For more questions on human rights
https://brainly.com/question/28652679
#SPJ8
what was a common belief among historians in the early 20th century
Answer: Answer:B. That the interests of white Americans are more important than the
interests of minorities
Explanation:
Why would electing judges and justices be problematic?
Electing judges and justices would be problematic because it would undermine the independence and impartiality of the judiciary, lead to decisions based on politics rather than justice, erode the public's trust in the judiciary, and limit the diversity of the judiciary.
Electing judges and justices would be problematic because it undermines the independence and impartiality of the judicial branch. When judges and justices are elected, they are beholden to the people who elected them and may feel pressure to make decisions based on popular opinion rather than legal precedent and the Constitution. This can lead to decisions that are based on politics rather than justice, and can erode the public's trust in the judiciary.
The judiciary is meant to be a check on the other two branches of government, and its independence is critical to its effectiveness. When judges and justices are elected, they become more like politicians, and their decisions may be seen as motivated by political considerations rather than a commitment to justice.
Additionally, electing judges and justices can lead to a lack of diversity in the judiciary, as candidates may only represent one political party or ideology, and may not be representative of the communities they serve.
For more such questions on judiciary, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/11827478
#SPJ8
Which speaker is most clearly expressing a politically liberal response to the energy crisis of the 1970s?
Speaker 1: Our economy is overly dependent on oil. We need to develop alternative energy sources such as solar, hydroelectric, and wind power.
Speaker 2: Our economy is overly dependent on foreign oil. We need to develop more North American oil production by fracking, drilling offshore, and drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.
Speaker 3: Our economy is overly dependent on foreign oil. The government needs to do everything possible to support businesses in oil-producing regions of the United States such as Texas and Alaska.
Speaker 4: Our economy is overly dependent on oil. We need to explore all energy options, including ethanol, biodiesel, clean coal, and even nuclear power.
A Speaker 1
B. Speaker 4
C. Speaker 3
D. Speaker 2
Speaker 1 most clearly expresses a politically liberal response to the energy crisis of the 1970s by advocating for alternative energy sources. So, the correct choice is option A.
Speaker 1 is the most clearly expressing a politically liberal response to the energy crisis of the 1970s.
They argue that the economy's heavy reliance on oil is problematic and propose developing alternative energy sources like solar, hydroelectric, and wind power. This viewpoint aligns with liberal values of promoting renewable and sustainable energy solutions to reduce dependence on fossil fuels and address environmental concerns.
Speaker 4 also suggests exploring various energy options, including ethanol, biodiesel, clean coal, and nuclear power. While these options may encompass a broader range of energy sources, it does not explicitly emphasize renewable and sustainable alternatives as strongly as Speaker 1.
On the other hand, Speaker 2 focuses on increasing North American oil production through methods like fracking, offshore drilling, and drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. This approach is not aligned with a politically liberal response, as it prioritizes expanding fossil fuel extraction rather than transitioning to cleaner energy sources.
Speaker 3 suggests supporting businesses in oil-producing regions of the United States, which does not address the broader goal of reducing oil dependency or promoting alternative energy solutions.
In conclusion, Speaker 1, advocating for the development of alternative energy sources, most clearly expresses a politically liberal response to the energy crisis of the 1970s.
For more questions on energy crisis
https://brainly.com/question/29763772
#SPJ8
The last war for independence from European colonial rule on the African continent was between
The last war for independence from European colonial rule on the African continent was between Portugal and the National Union for the Total Independence of Angola (UNITA)
What was the last war for independence ?Portugal and UNITA were two of the main protagonists in the Angolan War of Independence, which lasted from 1961 to 1975. Portugal was the colonial power in Angola at the time, and UNITA was one of the three main independence movements fighting for Angolan independence. The other two movements were the National Liberation Front of Angola (FNLA) and the Popular Movement for the Liberation of Angola (MPLA).
UNITA was founded in 1966 by Jonas Savimbi, a former Ovimbundu tribal chief who had been educated in Portugal. Savimbi was a charismatic leader who was able to attract a large following among the Ovimbundu people, who are the largest ethnic group in Angola.
Find out more on wars of independence at https://brainly.com/question/27362590
#SPJ1
Why did some Europeans buy and sell human slaves? Explain the Stono Rebellion.
During the era of European exploration, millions of Africans were enslaved and sent to the Americas to work on sugar and tobacco plantations.
In the 18th century, slavery was a common practice in the southern colonies of America, particularly South Carolina, where there was a large number of slaves. The slaves were required to work for long hours, seven days a week. Despite the inhumane treatment of slaves, European traders and planters continued to buy and sell them as property. So, why did some Europeans buy and sell human slaves? The Europeans bought and sold human slaves to exploit them for labor on their plantations.
Planters used slaves to grow cash crops such as cotton, sugar, and tobacco. Since the profits made from these crops were high, they needed a lot of laborers to cultivate them, so they turned to slavery to solve their labor shortage problem. The slave trade was a lucrative business that generated a lot of money for European traders. Slave traders would purchase slaves from West Africa and transport them across the Atlantic to the Americas. Once they arrived in the Americas, the slaves were sold to plantation owners.
The slave trade was so lucrative that it contributed significantly to the economies of European countries such as Portugal, Spain, and Britain. The Stono RebellionThe Stono Rebellion was a slave uprising that occurred in 1739 in South Carolina. It was the largest slave rebellion in the British colonies. The rebellion was sparked by the slaves' desire to gain their freedom and return to Africa.
Slaves in South Carolina were required to wear badges to identify them as slaves. In September 1739, a group of slaves led by a man named Jemmy stole weapons from a store and killed several white settlers. The slaves then marched towards Florida, hoping to find freedom there. However, they were caught and killed by a group of white settlers who were sent to stop them.
The Stono Rebellion led to stricter slave codes that made life harder for slaves in South Carolina. The slave codes banned slaves from learning how to read or write, owning property, or traveling without permission from their masters. The rebellion also showed that slaves were not willing to accept their fate and would do anything to fight for their freedom.
Europeans bought and sold human slaves to exploit them for labor on their plantations. The Stono Rebellion was a slave uprising that occurred in South Carolina in 1739 and was sparked by the slaves' desire to gain their freedom and return to Africa. The rebellion led to stricter slave codes that made life harder for slaves in South Carolina.
For more questions on freedom
https://brainly.com/question/13273450
#SPJ8
Match the inventor/innovator with their work, invention, or innovation
The Match of the invention to the inventor or innovator are:
1.printing press Johannes Gutenberg
2.steam engine James Watt
3.World Wide Robert Cailliau
What is the matchup?Printing Press - Johannes Gutenberg: Johannes Gutenberg, a German metal forger and innovator, is credited with concocting the printing press within the 15th century. His development revolutionized the method of printing by presenting mobile sort, which permitted for the effective generation of books and other printed materials.
Steam Motor - James Watt: James Watt, a Scottish engineer, is broadly respected as the developer of the present day steam motor within the 18th century. In spite of the fact that the fundamental concept of tackling steam control existed some time.
Learn more about invention from
https://brainly.com/question/789084
#SPJ1
Britain would now seize vessels carrying goods for Germany where ever they were found. Germany, on May 7, 1915 torpedoed the British luxury liner _______________off the coast the neutral American flag, but it actually carried 4200 cases of small arms ammunition and 1250 Shrapnel cases.
“Titanic”
“Lusitania”
“Queen Mary”
“Americana”
Germany, on May 7, 1915 torpedoed the British luxury liner “Lusitania off the coast the neutral American flag
The sinking of the LusitaniaThe sinking of the Lusitania was a significant event during World War I. The ship, a British ocean liner, was travelling from New York to Liverpool, England, when it was torpedoed by a German submarine on May 7, 1915.
The reason the Germans targeted the Lusitania was that they believed it was carrying military supplies for the Allies, which it was, hidden in its cargo. The ship was indeed carrying munitions among its cargo, but it was also carrying civilian passengers.
When the torpedo hit the ship, it sank quickly. Of the nearly 2,000 people on board, more than 1,100 died, including 128 Americans. The loss of American lives in the attack led to significant outcry in the United States and helped shift public opinion against Germany.
Read more on The Lusitania here https://brainly.com/question/28007062
#SPJ1