According to Aristotle, man by nature is a political animal, this can be justified by Russian invasion of Ukraine which is a s a result of both social and political conflict between Russia and Ukraine.
What is the meaning of political animal by Aristotle?Man is by nature a political animal by Aristotle means that man is destined by his own nature to dwell as a sociopolitical being.
Looking into the Russian invasion of Ukraine, we can see it was caused as a result of Russia's annexation of Crimea from Ukraine.
Learn more about Aristotle on:
https://brainly.com/question/24994054
#SPJ1
Discuss the psycho-analytic Theory of sigmund freud
According to Freud's psychoanalytic theory, all psychic energy is generated by libido. Freud suggested that our mental states were influenced by two competing forces: cathexis and anticathexis. Cathexis was described as an investment of mental energy in a person, idea, or object.
Earhart struck up a close friendship with another pioneering american woman. Who was she?.
Answer: Eleanor Roosevelt
Explanation:
HELP
OPEC is a collection of which type of countries?
A. Oil exporting
B. Underdeveloped
C. Muslim majority
D. Communist
OPEC is a collection of oil-exporting types of countries.
The majority of developing nations that export oil rely primarily or largely on petroleum resources for their economy. These are quickly running out. Their reserve to production ratios is often not much higher than the ideal minimum. Therefore, their governments have a strong incentive to slow down the depletion of these resources, while, of course, avoiding a reduction in oil output under normal conditions or affecting the economy of the oil-importing nations.
Reduced consumer demand for items made in oil-importing countries results in a rise in global savings, which pushes interest rates lower.
Learn more about oil exporting here:
https://brainly.com/question/1451212
#SPJ1
Civics Lesson 5: Extension Activity
Essential Question: Should the Electoral College Be Abolished?
The 2000 election and its aftermath prompted renewed debate over our
system for electing the President and Vice President
By Kay Maxwell, Robert Hardaway
YES
When the Constitution was written, the typical voter had few opportunities to learn about presidential candidates, so
the job of choosing the President was given to the Electoral College: Electors, who were appointed by their states.
were better educated than average citizens, who were not thought capable of making an informed choice.
Today, with universal education, TV, radio, newspapers, and the Internet, voters can learn about candidates for
themselves. And they should be trusted to choose their President.
The Electoral College is unfair in several ways. First, it gives more weight to votes cast in small states. (Each state's
electoral votes are equal to the number of members it has in the House and Senate combined.) Second, because the
Electoral College is "winner take all" in all but two states (Maine and Nebraska), people who disagree with the
majority in their state are not represented. Finally, the system allows the election of a President who does not have
the support of a majority of voters.
Without the Electoral College, candidates would campaign to get as many individual votes as possible in every state,
instead of focusing on states that provide key electoral votes. Each vote would make a difference and voters would
diel they truly had a stake in the elections, which could lead to increasted voting across the country. With a system of
direct election, all votes would be equally important and equally sought after. We need to abolish the Electoral
College and make our presidential elections one person, one vote.
-Kay J. Maxwell
President, League of Women Voters
Claim, Evidence, Reasoning: Read the above opinion that provides a “Yes”
answer to the essential question and answer the questions below:
1. What is the author claiming?
2. What evidence does the author use to support their claim?
3. What is the reasoning behind using the evidence to support the claim
(make a connection between the two):
These are the answers to the question
What the author is claiming in this passage is that the use of the electoral college as the way of picking the president is outdated, unfair as well as disadvantageous to the people of the United States.The evidence that the author used to back up the claim has to do with the use of these two states Nebraska and Maine. These are states that are small but may favor the president who may be elected even tough he is not the choice of the people.The reason I used this evidence to support my claim is that the states mentioned may not even produce the same number of votes like other states if the president was to be picked by the citizens solely. But despite their sizes, they still have the ability to make same picks as the large states.What is the electoral colleges?This is the way that the president of the United States has to be chosen. This is different from the methods where the citizens are solely responsible for choosing the president.
Read more on the electoral college here: https://brainly.com/question/13474496
#SPJ1
What impact did Amistad Decision have on antislavery movements?