The Mexican-American Civil Rights Movement was a significant movement in American history, especially in the mid-20th century. During this time, Chicanos organized, protested, and advocated for better living conditions, education, and job opportunities
Chicano refers to people of Mexican descent who live in the United States. Chicano identity is shaped by Mexican culture, history, and political struggles, as well as the experience of being a minority group in the United States.The Chicano movement emerged as a response to discrimination and social injustices faced by Mexican Americans. Chicano leaders demanded that Mexican Americans be treated equally to other Americans, with full access to education, jobs, and political representation.History of the Mexican-American Civil Rights MovementThe Mexican-American Civil Rights Movement began in the 1940s and continued through the 1970s. During this time, several organizations and individuals fought for better opportunities and equal rights for Mexican Americans.
Some of the significant events and movements during the Chicano movement include the following:The Zoot Suit Riots: In 1943, tensions between Mexican Americans and white Americans in Los Angeles led to a series of violent riots. The riots began after a group of white sailors attacked a group of Mexican-American youths wearing zoot suits. Over several days, violence broke out across the city, resulting in many injuries and arrests.The Brown Berets: In the late 1960s, the Brown Berets emerged as a militant Chicano organization. The group advocated for Chicano empowerment and protested against police brutality, war, and poverty. The Brown Berets staged many demonstrations and sit-ins to demand better living conditions for Mexican Americans.
The United Farm Workers: The United Farm Workers (UFW) was a labor union founded in 1962 by Cesar Chavez and Dolores Huerta. The union represented agricultural workers, many of whom were Mexican American. The UFW organized strikes, boycotts, and protests to demand better wages, working conditions, and labor rights for farmworkers.La Raza Unida Party: The La Raza Unida Party was a political party founded in 1970. The party sought to create a third political party to represent Chicano interests and promote Chicano empowerment. Although the party did not last long, it had a significant impact on Chicano politics and inspired other Chicano political groups.
To know more about Civil Rights:
https://brainly.com/question/14397578
#SPJ11
The members of the Second Continental Congress sent the Olive Branch Petition to King George III because
The members of the Second Continental Congress sent the Olive Branch Petition to King George III because they wanted to find a peaceful resolution to the conflict that was taking place between Great Britain and the American colonies.
The petition was sent in July 1775, shortly after the Battle of Bunker Hill, and it expressed the colonists' desire to remain loyal to the British crown while also demanding their rights as English citizens. The Olive Branch Petition was an attempt to avoid a full-scale war between the colonies and Great Britain. It was drafted by John Dickinson, a delegate from Pennsylvania, and was signed by representatives from all thirteen colonies. The petition acknowledged the king's authority over the colonies but also appealed to him to consider the colonists' grievances and to work with them to find a solution that would satisfy both sides.
The petition was a final attempt to resolve the issues between Great Britain and the colonies peacefully. However, King George III rejected the Olive Branch Petition and issued a proclamation declaring the colonies to be in open rebellion. This rejection made it clear to the colonists that there was no hope for a peaceful resolution, and it contributed to the decision to declare independence from Great Britain.
The Olive Branch Petition was an important document in the early days of the American Revolution. It demonstrated the colonists' desire to find a peaceful solution to their differences with Great Britain and their willingness to remain loyal to the British crown. However, the king's rejection of the petition made it clear that war was inevitable, and it paved the way for the Declaration of Independence and the creation of a new nation.
For more questions on American Revolution.
https://brainly.com/question/1799447
#SPJ8
Question 1 of 10 What did the Seventeenth Amendment do? OA. Allowed voters to directly elect the U.S. president OB. Established an Electoral College for all state elections OC. Allowed voters to directly elect senators OD. Established an Electoral College for senatorial elections
Answer:
C. Allowed voters to directly elect senators.
The Seventeenth Amendment states the following: The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each state, elected by the people thereof, for six years; and each Senator shall have one vote. The electors in each State shall have qualifications requisite for electors of the most numerous branch of State legislatures. When vacancies happen in the representation of any State in the Senate, the executive authority of such State shall issue writs of election to fill such vacancies: Provided, That the legislature of Any state may empower the executive thereof to make temporary appointments until the people fill the vacancies by election as the legislature may direct. This amendment shall not be so construed as to affect the election or term of any Senator chosen before it becomes valid as part of the Constitution.
What was the reasoning behind the 17th Amendment to the US Constitution?At the turn of the century, there was a large progressive movement in which a lot of reforms were undertaken. It generally favored direct democracy as a way to cleanse corruption. It's success is debatable long-term, especially with the amount of money needed to win elections in a direct democracy, but certainly the corruption situation at the time pre-17th was grave and at the time there was a grasp for solutions.
People at least at the time did not feel represented enough as the People by their states, in practice meaning the state legislature. They felt ( and amendment is a high bar so we know many felt this way) that they'd rather elect senators by a vote of the people than a vote of people who were voted for by the people.
There was a perception that state legislatures could be bought, or if not bought outright at least controlled through bosses who made themselves Senators. Matt Quay, PA, William Lorimer, IL, Roscoe Conkling, NY, James Smith NJ were examples of Senators over time who were also well-known political bosses in their states and made themselves Senator when five will get you ten a people's vote in the state would not have elected them. There was a Senator in Colorado that just straight out bought his seat.
Deadlock Issues, Horse -Trading Issues. Too many situations where states had no Federal representation in the Senate because the two parties were equally matched in the state legislature and couldn't pick a person. Serious state issues were subject to Senatorial horse-trading 'I'll vote for your dam if you vote for my Senator' or I won't vote for it if you don't. It angered people enough to take it away from 29 of their states.Better voting systems. When the Constitution was written voting in each state was different, not all states had direct votes of all people. This is part of the thinking of the lack of direct democracy in the Constitution at the President and Senate. SC only allowed large landholders to vote, Penn. at the time let everyone vote, New York let 'small holders' people who essentially owned a piece of property to vote. Direct democracy was more doable at the time of the 17th.Jealous House Members? By 1912, the House of Representatives had already considered an amendment five times, but each time the Senate blocked the amendment. House members it appears were tired of having to go in front of the people when Senators didn't have to, or at least it made it easier for them to vote for it than Senators.States Jumped the Shark anyway - 29 States had already decided to elect their Senators by vote. In New Jersey, it was not a binding vote but Woodrow Wilson as governor used his power to enforce it when boss James Smith wanted to take 'his' Senate seat. His action was a big boost for the 17th.As a result of the 17th, State legislatures lost their representation in the Federal government (outside of amendments) but states did not. The Senate still reflects representation by states. This occurs because of the size of states vs. equal number of Senators factor. Delaware and California both have two Senators.
If the 17th had cut the states into even geographic areas or population areas and gave each state two elected by the people, it would be true to say that the state was gone. All that the 17th did was change who decides what the state wants - people in the state instead of legislature in the state. States are still free to bring their interests - sometimes very narrow - to bear on the US government. Ethanol is an example of something that probably wouldn't have survived a US popular vote.
The Seventeenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution allowed voters to directly elect their state's U.S. senators, shifting from the previous system where senators were appointed by state legislatures.
Explanation:The Seventeenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, ratified in 1913, marked a significant modulation in the election of U.S. senators. According to the U.S. Constitution, every state is assigned two senators that each serve a six-year term. Initially, these senators were appointed by their respective state legislatures. However, the introduction of the Seventeenth Amendment allowed for senators to be elected by direct popular vote within each state. This essentially extended the democratic process, enabling voters to directly influence the choice of their state's senators, as opposed to them being appointed by state legislatures.
Learn more about Seventeenth Amendment here:https://brainly.com/question/14519239
#SPJ6
this person to build and maintain his empire killed three candidates for columbia's presidency, over 200 judges, and in excess of 1,000 police officers. who is he?
The person described is Pablo Escobar, a notorious Colombian drug lord and leader of the Medellín Cartel.
Escobar gained immense wealth and power through his involvement in the cocaine trade during the 1970s and 1980s. In his quest to protect his empire and evade capture, he resorted to extreme violence, including ordering the killings of three candidates for Colombia's presidency, over 200 judges, and more than 1,000 police officers. Escobar's reign of terror made him one of the most feared and influential criminals in history. His actions led to a wave of violence and instability in Colombia during that time.
To know more about Cartel. :
https://brainly.com/question/32177331
#SPJ4
Give the background and
events of the Russian
Revolution especially the
events of 1917
The background of the Russian Revolution was rooted in social and economic unrest, while the key events in 1917 included the February Revolution and the October Revolution, resulting in the overthrow of the tsarist regime and the establishment of a socialist government.
The Russian Revolution was a complex and transformative period in Russian history that took place in 1917. The background of the revolution can be traced back to decades of social, political, and economic unrest in Russia. The autocratic rule of the tsars, coupled with widespread poverty, inequality, and discontent among the working class and peasants, created a volatile environment ripe for revolution.In 1917, two major events shaped the course of the revolution. First was the February Revolution, triggered by mass protests and strikes in Petrograd (now St. Petersburg). This resulted in the abdication of Tsar Nicholas II, the establishment of a provisional government, and the emergence of dual power between the government and the Petrograd Soviet, a council representing workers and soldiers.The second event was the October Revolution, led by the Bolshevik Party under the leadership of Vladimir Lenin. On October 25 (according to the Julian calendar), the Bolsheviks seized power, overthrowing the provisional government in Petrograd. This marked the establishment of a socialist government, known as the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic.Overall, the Russian Revolution of 1917 was a turning point in Russian history, leading to the end of the tsarist regime and the emergence of the world's first socialist state. It had profound implications for global politics and influenced subsequent revolutionary movements around the world.For more questions on Russian Revolution
https://brainly.com/question/810738
#SPJ8
How do you think Thomas Jefferson's behavior as president might have affected the way future presidents viewed the office?
I believe Jefferson's behavior as president affected future presidents in different ways. Jefferson led the country with a modest attitude not wanting to show off his power. This could show how he wanted to connect with his citizens' way of life including the farmers and countrymen. Jefferson also showed he wanted to try to stay focused on his country and the problems they were facing within. He did not want to get involved the problems of other countries. However, this proved to be difficult to do, and it showed future leaders that they would have to know how to deal with their foreign counterparts. His presidency taught future presidents about connecting to the people and interpreting the Constitution strictly. Leaders could look at the good from the Jefferson era and continue to build on that while also learning from his mistakes with foreign countries and Native American groups.
In 1969, the Supreme Court overturned the conviction of a Ku Klux Klan member by ruling that the government could only restrict speech that __________.
is a prior restraint on the right of eminent domain
advocates imminent lawless action
created a clear and present danger to private property
qualifies as hate speech and maliciously defames a racial group
In Barron v. Baltimore (1833), the Supreme Court held that the Bill of Rights limits __________, not __________, action.
federal; state
state; local
local; state
state; federal
In 1969, the Supreme Court overturned the conviction of a Ku Klux Klan member by ruling that the government could only restrict speech that advocates imminent lawless action.
In Barron v. Baltimore (1833), the Supreme Court held that the Bill of Rights limits state, not federal, action.
This ruling was established in the case of Brandenburg v. Ohio, where the Court set a precedent that speech can only be restricted if it directly incites or produces imminent lawless action. The Court clarified that mere advocacy of abstract or hypothetical violence is protected by the First Amendment.
This landmark case established that the protections of the Bill of Rights, including the First Amendment, only applied to limit the actions of state governments and not those of the federal government. The decision emphasized that the Bill of Rights did not directly restrict the powers of state governments but rather ensured certain rights against federal infringement.
The Supreme Court's ruling in Brandenburg v. Ohio in 1969 clarified the limitations on restricting speech to cases of imminent lawless action. Additionally, Barron v. Baltimore in 1833 confirmed that the Bill of Rights applied to limit the actions of state governments, not the federal government. These cases have had a significant impact on the interpretation and application of constitutional rights in the United States.
To know more about Supreme Court click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29759733
#SPJ11
In US history, the Declaration of Independence introduced the concept that people were born ("endowed by their Creator") with certain rights that could not be taken away ("unalienable rights"), and expressed the belief that the role of government was to "secure these rights" based on "consent of the governed."
The US Constitution was created with the express purpose of "securing the blessings of liberty" for future generations.
QUESTION:
DQ1: Does the Constitution fulfill this goal of securing liberty for future generations? Why or why not? (If yes, how? If not, how could it be improved?).
The Constitution of the United States can be seen as fulfilling the goal of securing liberty for future generations to a significant extent. However, it is important to recognize that the achievement of this goal is an ongoing process and subject to interpretation.
The Constitution provides a framework for a democratic government with a system of checks and balances, separation of powers, and a Bill of Rights. These elements serve as important safeguards for individual liberties and ensure that power is not concentrated in the hands of a few. The Bill of Rights, in particular, enumerates specific rights and protections, such as freedom of speech, religion, and the right to due process, which are essential for preserving individual liberty.
Over the years, the Constitution has been interpreted and expanded through amendments and landmark court decisions to protect the rights of marginalized groups and promote greater inclusivity. Examples include the abolition of slavery (13th Amendment), granting equal protection under the law (14th Amendment), and ensuring voting rights regardless of race or gender (15th and 19th Amendments).
However, it is important to acknowledge that the Constitution has not always fulfilled the goal of securing liberty for all individuals throughout history. For instance, it took significant struggles and social movements to extend civil rights and equal protections to marginalized communities, such as African Americans, women, and LGBTQ+ individuals.
To improve the Constitution's ability to secure liberty for future generations, ongoing efforts are required to address societal challenges and promote equality and justice. This may involve reforms and amendments that further protect the rights of individuals, ensure equal access to opportunities, and address systemic inequalities. Additionally, continued civic engagement, active participation, and the protection of voting rights are essential in upholding the principles of liberty and ensuring that the Constitution evolves in response to the changing needs and values of society.
Learn more about Declaration of independence:
https://brainly.com/question/472238
#SPJ11
which group is represented by the skulls in this 1996 cartoon
identify two things of cultural or historical significance from the film and briefly summarize those two events so you can work on the next step.
The film industry is one of the most significant cultural aspects of society. The cultural and historical significance of films helps us comprehend more about the past and how society used to be and how we have evolved in the present.
Two things of cultural or historical significance from the film are given below:
1. The gladiator games depicted in the movie represent a cultural tradition of Ancient Rome. Gladiatorial games were a cultural event and a way to keep the populace entertained and distracted from problems. The events often took place in huge arenas, like the Colosseum in Rome. Gladiators were mostly slaves or prisoners of war, and they fought with the intent to kill one another or become free.
2. Another cultural or historical significance of the movie is the portrayal of the ancient Roman Empire. The movie is set in the late Roman Republic period, which was one of the most influential periods in the history of the Roman Empire. The film showcases the social hierarchy and class distinctions of the Roman Empire. The Roman Empire was one of the most advanced civilizations of the time, and their practices and cultural values have been passed down to us over the centuries, thanks to films like these.
Learn more about films:
https://brainly.com/question/30337602
#SPJ11
are the behaviors values and interests common to a culture
Yes, behaviors, values, and interests are common to a culture. These are the three essential components that make up a culture. Culture is the sum total of shared learned behaviors, values, and beliefs that distinguish one group of people from another.
Each culture has its own set of beliefs and customs that shape people's behavior and attitudes. These values and beliefs reflect what is important and acceptable in a particular culture. The customs and traditions of a culture also help to shape people's behaviors and attitudes.Culture is also defined by people's interests, such as music, art, food, and sports.
For example, in some cultures, football is a popular sport, while in others, cricket or rugby is more popular. Similarly, some cultures value literature and poetry, while others value music and dance.Each culture has its unique set of behaviors, values, and interests, which help to define the identity of that culture. These cultural components are passed down from one generation to the next through socialization, which is the process of learning the values, norms, and beliefs of one's culture.
To know more about culture:
https://brainly.com/question/30447976
#SPJ11
in 1869, congress set the number of supreme court justices at __________.
The Judiciary Act of 1869, also known as the Circuit Judges Act, established the number of Supreme Court justices at nine.
The decision to set the number of Supreme Court justices at nine was made through the Judiciary Act of 1869, also known as the Circuit Judges Act. This act was passed by Congress and signed into law by President Ulysses S. Grant.
Prior to this act, the number of justices on the Supreme Court had fluctuated over the years, with a minimum of five and a maximum of ten.
The choice to establish a fixed number of justices at nine was a significant development in the structure of the Supreme Court. This decision aimed to bring stability and consistency to the Court's composition and ensure an odd number of justices to avoid tie votes.
The act was driven by the desire for a balanced and efficient decision-making process within the highest court of the land.
Since then, the number of Supreme Court justices has remained at nine, providing a framework for the appointment and confirmation process of new justices and contributing to the Court's ability to fulfill its constitutional responsibilities.
Learn more about Judiciary Act here:
brainly.com/question/14069635
#SPJ11
How
did Fredrick Jackson Turner describe the historical changes in the
West?
Frederick Jackson Turner described the historical changes in the West as a frontier that shaped American democracy, individualism, and the American character.
Frederick Jackson Turner, an American historian, delivered his famous "Frontier Thesis" in 1893. According to Turner, the existence of the frontier in the American West played a crucial role in shaping the nation's history and character. He argued that the frontier was not only a physical place but also a transformative process that shaped American society and values. Turner emphasized that the frontier experience fostered rugged individualism, self-reliance, and a sense of democracy among Americans.
It encouraged social mobility and provided opportunities for new beginnings and personal growth. Turner's thesis suggested that as the frontier closed, America would need to find new frontiers, both physical and metaphorical, to sustain its democratic and pioneering spirit. His ideas had a significant impact on understanding American history and the role of the West in shaping the nation.
To know more about democracy, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/30466950
#SPJ4
Neanderthals and other ancient "cousins" of the human species have long been of interest to archaeologists. Not only are they interesting in their own right, but they also serve to highlight some truly unique attributes of our own. Among the various groups of ancient human relatives we have learned about so far, Neanderthals, in particular, are often presented as being very different from humans.
Respond to this post with an example of how you think Neanderthals are widely imagined by non-experts ("what do most people THINK that Neanderthals were like?" NOTE that in addition to the lecture, the reading from this week's module is also very useful for this discussion). Then explain how the EVIDENCE we have learned about in lecture and readings has challenged these widespread assumptions. ( total of 6 sentences needed).
Most people often imagine Neanderthals as primitive, brutish beings, lacking intelligence and sophistication. They are commonly depicted as hunched, dim-witted creatures with limited abilities for language and culture. However, the evidence presented in lectures and readings challenges these widespread assumptions.
Through the study of Neanderthal remains and archaeological sites, we have discovered that Neanderthals were not the primitive creatures they were once believed to be. Genetic analysis has shown that they shared a significant amount of DNA with modern humans, indicating that they were closely related to us. They had complex social structures and lived in organized communities.
Evidence of sophisticated tool-making and craftsmanship has been found, suggesting that Neanderthals had advanced cognitive abilities and the capacity for creativity. They created specialized tools, used fire, and engaged in hunting and gathering activities. Furthermore, studies on their diet and dental remains indicate that they had varied and diverse food intake, including plant-based resources.
Recent discoveries of Neanderthal art and symbolic behaviour challenge the notion that they lacked culture. Cave paintings and evidence of personal adornment demonstrate their capacity for artistic expression and symbolic thinking. Additionally, genetic studies have revealed interbreeding between Neanderthals and early humans, further indicating their close relationship with us.
In summary, the evidence presented in lectures and readings has challenged the popular perception of Neanderthals as primitive and unintelligent. They were much more complex, adaptable, and culturally sophisticated than previously believed. Neanderthals were our evolutionary cousins who possessed capabilities and characteristics that were not far removed from early humans.
jobs today are more physically demanding than they were in the early 1900s. TRUE OR FALSE?
False. Jobs today are not more physically demanding than they were in the early 1900s.
What has antony predicted about Brutus & Cassius and their armies? How was he proven wrong? How did he take being proven wrong?
Antony predicted that Brutus and Cassius, along with their armies, would be defeated in battle. However, he was proven wrong when Brutus and Cassius initially gained the upper hand. Upon realizing his mistake, Antony reacted with determination and resilience.
In William Shakespeare's play "Julius Caesar," Antony predicts that Brutus and Cassius, the leaders of the conspirators against Caesar, will be defeated in battle. He believes that their armies lack the unity and discipline necessary to prevail against the forces of Octavius and Antony.
However, Antony's prediction is proven wrong when Brutus and Cassius initially succeed in the Battle of Philippi, inflicting heavy losses on their opponents.
Despite the initial setback, Antony does not let his mistake discourage him. He regroups and rallies his forces, eventually turning the tide of the battle in his favor.
Antony's determination and resilience shine through as he strategizes and leads his troops to victory over Brutus and Cassius. Instead of dwelling on his erroneous prediction, Antony adapts to the changing circumstances and capitalizes on the weaknesses of his adversaries.
Learn more about Battle of Philippi here:
https://brainly.com/question/1558489
#SPJ11
what species of homo first migrated into and populated the middle east?
In Europe, Cro-Magnons are regarded as the earliest anatomically modern humans.
Around 50,000 years ago, they crossed into Eurasia through the Zagros Mountains (near modern-day Iran and eastern Turkey), with one group quickly occupying the Indian Ocean coast and another going further north to the Central Asian steppes.
Despite facing adaptation difficulties, humans colonized the region west of the Urals and engaged in reindeer hunting in particular. Winter temperatures ranged from 4 to 22 °F (20 to 30 °C), and fuel and shelter were in short supply. They moved about on foot and obtained their food mostly by hunting extremely mobile herds.
These difficulties were overcame through technological advances, such as the creation of custom clothes from fur-bearing animals, the building of hear-ths for heart-hs in shelters.
To know more about Cro-Magnon:
https://brainly.com/question/30552947
#SPJ4
what decision did the british make after the patriot victory at yorktown?
After the Patriot victory at Yorktown, the British made the decision to negotiate peace terms with the Patriots.
This led to the signing of the Treaty of Paris in 1783, which officially ended the American Revolutionary War. The agreement acknowledged American independence, gave the United States never-before seen boundaries including the Appalachian Mountains and the Mississippi River, and provided protections for both American shipping and fishing rights. The treaty marked the end of the French and Indian War in North America, and resulted in America's independence from Britain.
To know more about Patriot victory , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/14138894
#SPJ4
Section A
1. Name any two (2) Caribbean Political Systems.
Give two impacts of media on constituents.
Explain the concept of "rule of law".
The government of ‘Caribbean State A’ is faced with a situation where an international hotel chain is requesting to purchase an uninhabited 20-acre forest for development and use as one of its new eco-tourism boutique hotels. A small group of botanists have raised concerns that the forest is home to an indigenous plant currently at threat of extinction. Identify 2 reasons why the government of ‘Caribbean State A’ may decide to favor the hotelier’s plan?
Using a relevant example, give the definition for a transnational corporation.
Section B
Discuss how any four (4) factors taught can contribute to a change in political culture and political socialization of a nation.
Over the last 10 years social media has gained more relevance within the political space but there is still a place for traditional media. Do you agree with this statement? Discuss the reasons for the position taken.
In the last decade many Caribbean states have faced situations where the age-old debate of infrastructural development vs environmental protection comes into play. Citing some of these examples explain how Caribbean governments can strike a balance between preservation of the environment and benefiting the economic landscape of their country even in the face of Global warming.
Section C
9. While there is no internationally agreed definition of ‘good governance’, it may span the following topics: full respect of human rights; the rule of law; effective participation of citizens; political pluralism; transparent and accountable institutions; an efficient and effective public sector that is free from corruption; access to information and education; and political empowerment of people. It is thought, however, that a strong political culture with attitudes and values that foster responsibility, solidarity and tolerance is critical to maintain good governance.
Based on the above and your understanding of good governance, critically assess the gaps in adhering to principles of good governance in a named Caribbean country. Offer recommendations on how a change in the political culture may also improve good governance.
The Prime Minister of Barbados Mia Mottley has tasked you, her advisor on international affairs, to prepare a speech on the consequences of globalization on the Caribbean region. She will be speaking at the University of the Commonwealth Caribbean’s annual lecture for students of public administration.
Considering contemporary issues, draft a speech addressing the concerns on any 2 of the following thematic areas: employment, healthcare, migration, technology, education, climate change.
Section A:
Two Caribbean Political Systems: Parliamentary Democracy and Presidential Republic.
Two impacts of media on constituents: Information dissemination and shaping public opinion.
Explanation of "rule of law": The principle that all individuals and institutions are subject to the law, ensuring accountability and equal application.
Two reasons for favouring the hotelier's plan: Economic development and balancing priorities.
Definition of a transnational corporation: Large-scale business operating in multiple countries.
Section B:
Factors contributing to a change in political culture: Education, media, social movements, and economic conditions.
Relevance of social media and traditional media: Both have roles in the political landscape due to direct engagement, wider reach, credibility, and in-depth analysis.
Balancing environmental preservation and economic development: Sustainable practices, eco-tourism, environmental assessments, protected areas, renewable energy, and climate change strategies.
Section C:
Gaps in adhering to good governance principles: Please specify the Caribbean country.
Recommendations for improving good governance: Foster transparency, enhance citizen participation, strengthen institutions, and promote civic education.
Define and give the significance of the following, in a substantial paragraph.
Revolutionary Calendar - Oct. 5/1793 Persian Letters (written by Montesquieu)
The Revolutionary Calendar, also known as the French Republican Calendar, was a calendar system introduced during the French Revolution in October 1793.
The Revolutionary Calendar consisted of 12 months of 30 days each, with each month divided into three ten-day weeks called "decades." Additionally, five or six additional days were added at the end of the year as a non-working period known as "complementary days." The months were given new names based on natural elements and agricultural seasons, such as "Vendémiaire" (vintage), "Brumaire" (mist), and "Thermidor" (heat).
Significance:
The Revolutionary Calendar was a symbolic representation of the profound changes occurring during the French Revolution. Its introduction aimed to create a clean break from the past, including the religious and monarchical traditions associated with the Gregorian calendar. By establishing a new calendar, the revolutionaries sought to foster a sense of national unity and promote the ideals of the revolution, such as secularism and rationality.
The Revolutionary Calendar also had practical implications. It aimed to rationalize time measurement, as the decimal-based system made calculations and administrative tasks more efficient. Additionally, the calendar attempted to align agricultural activities with the natural cycles, emphasizing the importance of agriculture to the new republic.
While the Revolutionary Calendar faced resistance and was eventually abolished in 1806, it played a significant role in symbolizing the radical changes of the French Revolution. Its introduction and adoption demonstrated the revolutionaries' intent to reshape every aspect of society, including the way time was perceived and organized.
Learn more about French Revolution here:
brainly.com/question//31068480
#SPJ11
how is nirvana different from the religious goal of hinduism
The primary objective of Hinduism is moksha, and the primary objective of Buddhism is nirvana. Hindus see moksha as escaping the cycle of reincarnation.
Buddhist and Hindu literature present the idea of Nirvana in distinct ways. The idea of Atman, also known as the soul or self, is held to exist in every living thing by Hinduism, whereas Buddhism holds that there is no Atman in any living thing through its anatman doctrine.
The Sanskrit term "nirvana" is used in the literature of several ancient Indian traditions, but Buddhism is the most commonly associated with it because it is the oldest and most common name for the Buddhist path's goal. Numerous Buddhist paths aim for nirvana, which signifies spiritual liberation from suffering in the world and rebirths in sasra.
Learn more about Nirvana:
brainly.com/question/21946850
#SPJ4
Which of the following is NOT a necessry component of religion?
Myth
Narrative
God
Morality
Ritual
Among the given options, morality is not a necessary component of religion.
Religion encompasses a wide range of beliefs and practices, and while morality is often closely associated with religious systems, it is not an intrinsic or universal requirement.
Different religions have varying moral frameworks, and some religious traditions may not prioritize or explicitly focus on moral teachings.
Myth, narrative, God, and ritual are commonly regarded as essential components of religion. Myths and narratives provide stories and explanations that give meaning and context to religious beliefs and practices. The concept of God or deities is central to many religious systems, representing the ultimate source of authority and devotion.
Rituals, which include ceremonies, prayers, and symbolic actions, are integral to religious observance, serving as expressions of faith, reverence, and community cohesion.
Learn more about Rituals here:
https://brainly.com/question/32473078
#SPJ11
what/who was the catalyst for the conflict and trials in salem in 1692
The catalyst for the conflict and trials in Salem in 1692 was the societal fear of witchcraft.
A group of young girls began to display physical symptoms such as convulsions, which lead to speculations about witchcraft in the area. The fear of Satanic influence in Salem Village led to the accusation of several individuals as being witches. Once the accusers, mostly young women, started to accuse members of the village of witchcraft, hysteria spread and local magistrates began a series of hearings as well as jailing more people.
The Salem Witch Trials became a watershed moment in American history, resulting in mass hysteria, religious extremism, and the wrongful conviction and execution of dozens of people. The so-called ‘victims’ of witchcraft were tortured and their freedom ultimately lost due to this unfounded fear of the unknown. The Salem Witch Trials are an example of how extreme religious fervor and paranoia can lead to disaster.
To know more about Salem , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/31180572
#SPJ4
the patriots gained the support of the french government after
The patriots gained the support of the French government after the American victory in the Battle of Saratoga.
The American victory in the Battle of Saratoga was a turning point in the American Revolution. It was the first significant victory of the Continental Army over the British Army, and it convinced France to enter the war on the side of the Americans. The French had been secretly aiding the Americans for some time, but the victory at Saratoga convinced them that the Americans could win the war.
The French government saw an opportunity to weaken their rival, Great Britain, and to regain some of the territory they had lost in North America during the Seven Years' War. They signed the Treaty of Alliance with the United States in 1778, which formally recognized the United States as an independent nation and promised military support in the war against Great Britain. The French navy played a crucial role in the victory at the Battle of Yorktown, which effectively ended the war and led to the recognition of American independence.
To know more about government:
https://brainly.com/question/4160287
#SPJ11
A leading characterization of U.S. foreign policy in the early twentieth century was:
answer choices
O "Golden-Rule Diplomacy."
O "Benign Neglect."
O "Dollar Diplomacy."
O "Preemptive Engagement."
A leading characterization of U.S. foreign policy in the early twentieth century was "Dollar Diplomacy."
"Dollar Diplomacy" was a prominent feature of U.S. foreign policy during the early twentieth century, particularly under President William Howard Taft. It emphasized the use of economic power and investment to advance American interests and extend influence in other countries. The policy aimed to promote U.S. commercial interests abroad and maintain political stability through economic intervention.
It involved offering financial assistance, loans, and investments to foreign governments in exchange for favorable trade conditions, access to resources, and the protection of American business interests. Dollar Diplomacy represented a departure from the previous "gunboat diplomacy" approach and reflected a focus on economic expansion and securing economic advantages in international relations.
To know more about foreign policy, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/27950081
#SPJ4
TRUE / FALSE.
The map of the states under the Articles of Confederation is very similar to the modern map of the "states along the eastern seaboard."
False. The map of the states under the Articles of Confederation is not very similar to the modern map of the "states along the eastern seaboard."
The map of the states under the Articles of Confederation, which was the first constitution of the United States from 1781 to 1789, is significantly different from the modern map of the states along the eastern seaboard.
Under the Articles of Confederation, there were thirteen original states: New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia.
These states extended from the northernmost regions of New England to the southernmost areas of the Atlantic coast. The modern map of the states along the eastern seaboard includes the original thirteen states along with additional states that were admitted to the Union after the ratification of the U.S. Constitution.
Learn more about Articles of Confederation here:
https://brainly.com/question/13608970
#SPJ11
which country held onto eastern timor well after the dutch left indonesia?
After the Dutch left Indonesia, the country that held onto East Timor was Indonesia itself.
Following the departure of the Dutch from Indonesia, East Timor remained under the control of Indonesia for several decades. The Indonesian government asserted its authority over East Timor, considering it as part of its territory. This led to a prolonged period of annexation and integration attempts by Indonesia.
In 1975, Indonesia launched a military invasion of East Timor, which resulted in the annexation of the region as its 27th province. This invasion was met with resistance from the East Timorese people, who sought independence. The subsequent years saw a brutal occupation marked by widespread human rights abuses and violence.
Learn more about annexation here:
https://brainly.com/question/30328750
#SPJ11
The new economic policy was established in 1922 what was the effect of this policy change
The New Economic Policy (NEP) was introduced in 1922, after the Russian Civil War, by the Soviet government to re-establish the country's shattered economy. It was the Bolshevik government's attempt to initiate an economic policy that would gradually move the country from a state-controlled command economy to a market-oriented one, while preserving the socialist system and increasing industrialization.
What were the impacts of this policy change? The NEP had a significant influence on the Soviet economy. The following are some of the NEP's most significant effects:
1. Industrialization: The NEP allowed for the growth of private businesses, particularly in the manufacturing sector. This growth has improved the standard of living of citizens, boosted job growth, and increased industrialization.
2. Agriculture: The NEP improved the agricultural sector by introducing policies that stimulated peasants to increase their yields, including the removal of grain requisitions, tax reductions, and the ability to trade surplus products on the market.
3. Capitalism: The NEP allowed private businesses to operate alongside state-run enterprises, allowing the country to benefit from the advantages of both capitalism and socialism.
4. Socioeconomic impact: The NEP had a significant socioeconomic effect on the country. It reduced the wealth disparity between peasants and city dwellers, as well as between different ethnic groups.
5. Soviet economy: The NEP's policies resulted in a revitalization of the Soviet economy. The country experienced significant economic development, including an increase in GDP, industrial output, and agricultural production.
For more questions on The New Economic Policyhttps
https://brainly.com/question/15467058
#SPJ8
why did senator crittenden’s proposed compromise receive little support?
Senator Crittenden's proposed compromise received little support due to several key factors.
Senator Crittenden's proposed compromise aimed to address the growing tensions between the North and South in the United States during the 1860s. The compromise included measures such as extending the Missouri Compromise line, guaranteeing the protection of slavery in certain territories, and reinforcing fugitive slave laws. However, despite its intention to find a middle ground and preserve the Union, the compromise failed to garner significant support for several reasons.
Firstly, the compromise was seen by many as a temporary solution that did not adequately address the underlying issues at hand. It attempted to maintain a delicate balance between the interests of the North and the South, but it failed to provide a long-term resolution to the deep-rooted conflicts surrounding slavery and states' rights.
Secondly, the timing of the proposed compromise played a significant role in its lack of support. By the time Senator Crittenden introduced his compromise, the nation was already deeply divided, with tensions escalating rapidly. The fervent abolitionist movement in the North and the secessionist sentiments in the South had hardened the positions of both sides, making it difficult for a compromise to gain traction.
Additionally, the compromise faced opposition from extremist factions on both sides of the debate. Abolitionists in the North viewed any concessions on slavery as a betrayal of their cause, while pro-slavery advocates in the South believed the compromise did not go far enough to protect their interests. These opposing views and the intense polarization within the country contributed to the limited support for Senator Crittenden's proposed compromise.
In conclusion, Senator Crittenden's proposed compromise received little support due to its perceived temporary nature, the heightened tensions during that period, and the opposition from extreme factions. Despite its attempt to bridge the gap between the North and the South, the compromise ultimately failed to gain the necessary backing to bring about a resolution to the deeply divisive issues of the time.
Learn more about Crittenden's
brainly.com/question/30228837
#SPJ11.
In term of accountability, what new practices evolved in the
nineteenth and early twentieth centuries? Did these practices
increase or decrease the discretion of accountants?
In the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, new practices in accountability emerged, leading to increased discretion for accountants.
During the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, various new practices in accountability emerged that aimed to enhance transparency and accuracy in financial reporting. One significant development was the introduction of double-entry bookkeeping, which provided a systematic approach to recordkeeping and helped ensure balanced and accurate financial statements.
Additionally, the establishment of professional accounting organizations and the implementation of standardized accounting principles, such as the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), contributed to improved accountability. However, despite these advancements, these new practices also increased the discretion of accountants.
Learn more about double-entry bookkeeping here:
https://brainly.com/question/32370049
#SPJ11
FILL THE BLANK.
the ___ ensured that the soviet union and its bloc would respect the human rights of its citizens.
The Helsinki Accords ensured that the Soviet Union and its bloc would respect the human rights of its citizens.
The Helsinki Accords were a series of agreements reached between the Western democracies and the Soviet Union and its Eastern European allies. The Accords aimed to promote peace, cooperation, and human rights.
One of the key provisions of the Helsinki Accords was the recognition of the importance of human rights, including freedom of thought, expression, and movement. By signing the Accords, the Soviet Union and its bloc committed to respecting these fundamental rights within their territories.
The Helsinki Accords established a framework for monitoring and promoting human rights. They created the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe (CSCE), which included regular meetings and reporting mechanisms to assess compliance with the Accords.
Learn more about Helsinki Accords here:
https://brainly.com/question/28741211
#SPJ11